2015
DOI: 10.1590/0100-5405/2031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caracterización de la respuesta morfológica de variedades susceptibles y resistentes de yuca (Manihot esculenta Crantz) a la bacteriosis vascular causada por Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. manihotis

Abstract: Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. manihotis is one of the major limitations for cassava cultivation. In the present study, optical microscopy was used to perform a comparative analysis of the morphological and histochemical changes in the stem of a susceptible (TMS60444) and a resistant (CM6438-14) cassava variety at 7 and 14 days after inoculation with the pathogenic strain CIO151. The resistant variety was detected to generate callose barriers on the cell walls Sandino, T.; López-Kleine, L.; López, C.; Marquínez, X… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Histological studies on inoculated cassava plants have shown that the difference between resistant and susceptible cultivars is expressed as a variation in colonization rates and penetration into the vascular tissue. In addition, both resistant and susceptible plants have shown similar defense responses in vascular tissues, nevertheless these responses are more intense and faster in the resistant cultivar (Kpemoua et al 1996;Sandino et al 2015). This data support the hypothesis that cassava resistance to CBB is quantitative and polygenic (Kpemoua et al 1996;Jorge et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Histological studies on inoculated cassava plants have shown that the difference between resistant and susceptible cultivars is expressed as a variation in colonization rates and penetration into the vascular tissue. In addition, both resistant and susceptible plants have shown similar defense responses in vascular tissues, nevertheless these responses are more intense and faster in the resistant cultivar (Kpemoua et al 1996;Sandino et al 2015). This data support the hypothesis that cassava resistance to CBB is quantitative and polygenic (Kpemoua et al 1996;Jorge et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…These mechanisms have been extensively studied in model plants, but knowledge generated in cassava is relatively scarce. Histology and cytochemistry studies of the resistance mechanisms in cassava during Xam infection showed callose deposition that act as a barrier in cortical parenchyma cells and phloem to block bacterial multiplication and dispersion (Kpémoua et al, 1996; Sandino et al, 2015). Other mechanisms of defense response including cell wall fortification, lignification and suberization associated with callose deposition and production of flavonoids and polysaccharides were also observed and they are faster and stronger in resistant cultivars compared to susceptible ones (Kpémoua et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%