2022
DOI: 10.1109/access.2022.3161941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CARAN: A Context-Aware Recency-Based Attention Network for Point-of-Interest Recommendation

Abstract: Point-of-interest (POI) recommendation system that tries to anticipate user's next visiting location has attracted a plentiful research interest due to its ability in generating personalized suggestions. Since user's historical check-ins are sequential in nature, Recurrent neural network (RNN) based models with context embedding shows promising result for modeling user's mobility. However, such models can not provide correlation between non-consecutive and non-adjacent visits for understanding user's behavior.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To show the merits of the suggested personalized point-of-interest recommendation method, the transfer learning-based POI-recommendation method (Gupta & Bedathur, 2022), the CARAN method (Hossain et al, 2022), and GETNext (Yang et al, 2022) were compared with the proposed method under identical experimental conditions. The efficacy of each model's recommendations was assessed using Precision@K and Recall@K. To eliminate experimental result contingency, the recommended POI K numbers are 5, 10, and 15.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To show the merits of the suggested personalized point-of-interest recommendation method, the transfer learning-based POI-recommendation method (Gupta & Bedathur, 2022), the CARAN method (Hossain et al, 2022), and GETNext (Yang et al, 2022) were compared with the proposed method under identical experimental conditions. The efficacy of each model's recommendations was assessed using Precision@K and Recall@K. To eliminate experimental result contingency, the recommended POI K numbers are 5, 10, and 15.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A bidirectional, gated network is suggested by the module for obtaining review text attributes. Bidirectional encoder representation from transformers (BERT) and an attention mechanism are used in the recurrent unit (Bi-GRU) text analysis method to assist the model choose the most important reviews [21], [22]. Construct a context-aware recency-based attention network (CARAN) that uses the attention mechanism to give recent visitation spots the highest priority based on the temporal and spatial context and the weather.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After proving their mantle in other fields, deep learning models like LSTM, CNN, attention network, and GRU have also been deployed in POI recommendations over the past years. Hossain et al [20] addressed the issue of nonconsecutiveness and non-adjacent visits in user behavior in their proposed framework CARAN that utilized an attention network to cater to the recency in the visits along with the weather conditions influence. The non-adjacent checkins and spatial distance consideration were monitored using spatiotemporal matrices, liner interpolation method, and positional encoding of check-in sequence.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporal content also holds critical weightage in recommendation tasks, representing both periodicity and asymmetry in check-in trajectory. Owing to the temporal aspect, the recency in the historical check-ins has also been exploited in [4], [5]. Semantic content has also been explored in combination with spatiotemporal data for user preference mining in several approaches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%