Background: Post-partum hemorrhage (PPH)is a noteworthy reason for maternal death in underdeveloped countries, virtually all fatalities coming about (PPH) happen within the initial 24 hours after birth. Most of these could be avoided by using prophylactic uterotonics during the third phase of parturition, by ideal, fitting administration.
Aim:To realize which medication is more valuable as prophylaxis of P.P.H Carbetocin or misoprostol in elective lower segment caesarean segment.
Materials and Methods:This randomized controlled study comprised eligible 100 low-risk patients and 50 women who received 1 ampoule of carbetocin diluted with 100 ml distilled water and received IV after delivery of the baby (group A). The patient in the( group B) received two tablets of misoprostol rectally after insertion of the urinary catheter directly before sterilizing the patient during lower segment CS.Result: There was a significant difference in atony of the uterus during surgery in patients who received rectal misoprostol than in patients who received IV carbetocin {15 (30%) versus 5 (10%) Pvalue 0.012}, respectively. and the necessity for transfused blood {23 (46%) versus 9 (18) P-value 0.003 necessity for another uterotonic medication was statistically significantly higher in misoprostol group {32 (64%) vs 15 (30%) P-value 0.001}, different on Hb and HcT measure after born higher in misoprostol group with high statistic significant {9.08 ± 0.72 vs 10.01 ± 0.75, P-value: <0.0001} {29.26 ± 2.13 vs 32.56 ± 2.33, P-value <0.001}.
Conclusion:IV of 100 ug carbetocin minimized bleeding during CS more than 400 ug misoprostol per rectum.