2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbohydrate 3D structure validation

Abstract: Glycoproteins and protein-carbohydrate complexes in the worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB) can be an excellent source of information for glycoscientists. Unfortunately, a rather large number of errors and inconsistencies is found in the glycan moieties of these 3D structures. This review illustrates frequent problems of carbohydrate moieties in wwPDB entries, such as nomenclature issues, incorrect N-glycan core structures, missing or erroneous linkages, or poor glycan geometry, and describes the carbohydrate-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the major improvement observed over the last 15 years is probably due to the introduction of automated tools that are checking the accuracy of structural models deposited to the PDB 41,42 . However, the 1994‐1998 level of accuracy of β‐D‐GlcNAc units had still not been reached again in 2017‐2019, suggesting that the use of carbohydrate validation tools such as PDB‐CARE 43 or Privateer 24 may still need to be systematized 6 . Note, however, that neither PDB‐CARE nor Privateer presently check the cis ‐ trans state of GlcNAc units.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the major improvement observed over the last 15 years is probably due to the introduction of automated tools that are checking the accuracy of structural models deposited to the PDB 41,42 . However, the 1994‐1998 level of accuracy of β‐D‐GlcNAc units had still not been reached again in 2017‐2019, suggesting that the use of carbohydrate validation tools such as PDB‐CARE 43 or Privateer 24 may still need to be systematized 6 . Note, however, that neither PDB‐CARE nor Privateer presently check the cis ‐ trans state of GlcNAc units.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growing availability of 3D protein‐carbohydrate complex structures allows to perform statistical studies of these interactions at the atomic level 4,5 . Unfortunately, the protein databank (PDB) contains numerous wrong carbohydrate annotations, 6 as well as severe structural defects, 7,8 due for instance to the lack of carbohydrate torsion control during crystallographic structure refinement 9 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, this is not only a new resource in its own right, but it can also serve for better homology restraint generation for future structure refinement. It should be noted that the improvement over the entire resolution range is also the result of other improvements to the PDB‐REDO pipeline and the external programs therein, including better treatment of twinning, general improvements to TLS, NCS, and ADP refinement, validation, and correction of structural zinc sites, better handling of carbohydrates, improved selection of resolution cut‐off and the generation of anomalous difference maps when possible. All these developments are consistently and uniformly applied in all entries, in addition to the applicable homology‐derived restraints.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, it is not only a new resource in its own right, but it can also serve for better homology restraint generation for future structure refinement. In addition, the entire PDB-REDO databank is constructed with a single software version (which has not been possible before) and with new algorithms: these include better treatment of twinning, general improvements to TLS, NCS, and ADP refinement 1 , validation and correction of structural zinc sites 30 , better handling of carbohydrates 31 , improved selection of resolution cut-off and the generation of anomalous difference maps when possible. All these developments are consistently and uniformly applied in all entries, in addition to the applicable homology-derived restraints.…”
Section: Redo Pipeline (See Online Methods For Details)mentioning
confidence: 99%