2006
DOI: 10.1016/s1872-2032(06)60024-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon accumulation and distribution in Pinus massoniana and Cunninghamia lanceolata mixed forest ecosystem in Daqingshan, Guangxi, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the vegetation biomass C, soil contains the world's largest terrestrial active C pool, which plays a major role in the global carbon cycle [27]. In our study, mineral soil C content increased exponentially from the five-year stand to the 15-year stand and then dropped sharply from the 19-year stand to the 42-year stand, clearly indicating the absence of age effect on mineral soil carbon concentrations and storage ( Figure 1g); about 67.97% of the mean total mineral soil C content across the different stand ages in the chronosequence was sequestered in the upper soil horizon (0-30-cm) depth, higher than the 49.22% reported by Kang et al [48] for the 0-20-cm upper mineral soil horizon profile, but lower than the findings of Cao et al [56], who reported an average mean of 70.0% C content sequestered at the 20-cm upper mineral soil horizon. Our average mean total mineral soil C sequestered in the 0-60-cm depth was 216.12 t· ha −1 , closer to the findings of Zhou et al [57], who reported a mean soil C content storage of 193.55 t· ha −1 in the Chinese forests, which is about 3.4-times that of vegetation, but lower than the findings of Gao et al [58], who reported a mean value of 411 t· ha −1 at the profile of 0-100-cm in a…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In addition to the vegetation biomass C, soil contains the world's largest terrestrial active C pool, which plays a major role in the global carbon cycle [27]. In our study, mineral soil C content increased exponentially from the five-year stand to the 15-year stand and then dropped sharply from the 19-year stand to the 42-year stand, clearly indicating the absence of age effect on mineral soil carbon concentrations and storage ( Figure 1g); about 67.97% of the mean total mineral soil C content across the different stand ages in the chronosequence was sequestered in the upper soil horizon (0-30-cm) depth, higher than the 49.22% reported by Kang et al [48] for the 0-20-cm upper mineral soil horizon profile, but lower than the findings of Cao et al [56], who reported an average mean of 70.0% C content sequestered at the 20-cm upper mineral soil horizon. Our average mean total mineral soil C sequestered in the 0-60-cm depth was 216.12 t· ha −1 , closer to the findings of Zhou et al [57], who reported a mean soil C content storage of 193.55 t· ha −1 in the Chinese forests, which is about 3.4-times that of vegetation, but lower than the findings of Gao et al [58], who reported a mean value of 411 t· ha −1 at the profile of 0-100-cm in a…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The R/S ratio mean value of 0.23 observed in this study corresponds to the standard value of 0.23 reported for coniferous species [ Kurz et al ., ]. However, the shrub layer had shown a considerably higher R/S ratio (0.69, Table S6) compared to 0.46 reported by [ Kang et al ., ] which is related to the presence of different shrub species in the investigated forest biomes that all have different growth requirements, water holding capacity, and response mechanisms to stress and other disturbances. In addition, the roots in the shrub layer are hidden belowground structures compared to the aboveground structures that are susceptible to trampling during the litter collection from the forest floor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Majority of the researchers considered the global C fraction of 47% provided by IPCC [] for converting forest vegetation biomass into C. However, in a recent review by Sean and Martin [], results revealed that the assumed C content of 50% of tree biomass is not accurate. In this study, the tree components C contents range from 45.0% to 55.5% with an average mean value of 51.6% which was within the range of 46.8–58.6 reported for a masson pine plantation [ Kang et al ., ] but varied slightly from the global mean value of 50.8 reported for coniferous forests of all biomes [ Sean and Martin , ]. The above insignificant difference is attributable to the analysis method, stand age, pedoclimatic conditions, and origin [ Bert and Danjon , ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Past studies suggest that the carbon storage in litter is relatively small and stable in general, accounting for only 1-4% of the total forest carbon storage (Fang et al 2002;Zhong 2009;Zhu et al 2010).…”
Section: Certainty Vs Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%