2018
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon allocation and competition maintain variation in plant root mutualisms

Abstract: Plants engage in multiple root symbioses that offer varying degrees of benefit. We asked how variation in partner quality persists using a resource‐ratio model of population growth. We considered the plant's ability to preferentially allocate carbon to mutualists and competition for plant carbon between mutualist and nonmutualist symbionts. We treated carbon as two nutritionally interchangeable, but temporally separated, resources—carbon allocated indiscriminately for the construction of the symbiosis, and car… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biological market perspectives emphasizing the metabolic cost of fungal resource capture 33 suggest that plants may associate with ECM mutualists that maximize N acquisition and minimize plant carbon (C) expenditure (N return on C investment) 34 , 35 . ECM taxa vary widely in their capacity to decay SOM 30 , 36 , with greater decay capacity likely carrying a greater C cost to their plant host 37 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological market perspectives emphasizing the metabolic cost of fungal resource capture 33 suggest that plants may associate with ECM mutualists that maximize N acquisition and minimize plant carbon (C) expenditure (N return on C investment) 34 , 35 . ECM taxa vary widely in their capacity to decay SOM 30 , 36 , with greater decay capacity likely carrying a greater C cost to their plant host 37 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies at local, regional, and continental scales consistently identify soil inorganic N availability as a key determinant of ECM fungal community composition (Taylor et al, 2000;Lilleskov et al, 2002a;Peay et al, 2015;van der Linde et al, 2018). Biological market perspectives provide insight into how N availability and fungal N acquisition traits may interact to structure these communities (Koide et al, 2014;Christian & Bever, 2018). Plants may partner with fungal mutualists that maximize N (or phosphorus) acquisition, while minimizing photosynthate expenditure (Hortal et al, 2017;Bogar et al, 2019;Meeds et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mechanism requires that the host favours guild members with more beneficial traits, thereby explaining the persistence of good mutualists. Such preferential allocation of resources has been documented in the AM symbiosis (Kiers et al, 2011;Hammer et al, 2011;Bever et al, 2009;Ji and Bever, 2016) and has theoretical support (Bachelot and Lee, 2018;Bever, 2015;Moeller and Neubert, 2016;Hoeksema and Kummel, 2003;Christian and Bever, 2018;Křivan and Revilla, 2019;Valdovinos et al, 2013). However, experimental studies have yielded inconsistent results (Fitter, 2006;Kiers and Van Der Heijden, 2006;Walder and van der Heijden, 2015) and no physiological basis for host discrimination has been identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%