Carbon and Energy Footprints of Prefabricated Industrial Buildings: A Systematic Life Cycle Assessment Analysis

Abstract

Abstract:A systematic analysis of green-house gases emission (carbon footprint) and primary energy consumption (energy footprint) of prefabricated industrial buildings during their entire life cycle is presented. The life cycle assessment (LCA) study was performed in a cradle-to grave approach: site-specific data from an Italian company, directly involved in all the phases from raw material manufacturing to in-situ assembly, were used to analyze the impacts as a function of different design choices. Four buildings were analyzed and results were used to setup a parameterized model that was used to study the impacts of industrial prefabricated buildings over the input parameter space. The model vs. data agreement is within 4% for both carbon and energy footprint. The functional unit is 1 m 3 of prefabricated building, considering a 50-year lifetime. The results of the four buildings decrease from 144.6 kgCO 2eq /m 3 and 649.5 kWh/m 3 down to 123.5 kgCO 2eq /m 3 and 556.8 kWh/m 3 as the building floor area increases from 1048 m 2 to 21,910 m 2 . The use phase accounts for the major impact (approximate 76%). It is found that the carbon footprint is proportional to the energy footprint, the proportional factor being 0.222 kgCO 2eq /kWh within 0.5% accuracy. Finally, a systematic study of the sensitivity of input parameters (insulation, lifetime, foundation type) is presented.

Development of a Carbon Emissions Analysis Framework Using Building Information Modeling and Life Cycle Assessment for the Construction of Hospital Projects

“…In addition, echoing the research on different structure schemes [14,[59][60][61][62][63], this method can also be used to evaluate the difference in carbon emissions between different building structure schemes. When other factors are similar, the structural designer can choose a reasonable structure scheme based on the reduction of carbon emissions.…”

“…Zhang and Wang compared the differences between structures of brick-concrete, masonry-concrete, and reinforced concrete [14]. In addition, some scholars have also compared the carbon emissions between prefabricated structures and traditional structures [59][60][61]. In recent years, modern wood houses promoted the idea and application of environmentally and energetically efficient constructions [62,63].…”

Environmental Performance of Innovative Ground-Source Heat Pumps with PCM Energy Storage

“…During the entire building's life cycle (from construction to demolition), a major share of the required energy (80-90%) is associated with operating energy [6], and up to 60% of the total energy consumption is due to air-conditioning [7]. The enhancement of air-conditioning energy efficiency, coupled with an integration of renewable-energy technologies, is considered an effective solution to mitigate the environmental impacts of buildings [8][9][10][11][12].…”

Experimental Analysis and Process Modeling of Carbon Dioxide Removal Using Tuff

“…Before the breakthrough point, all samples show the same behavior (all of the input CO 2 is effectively adsorbed and the slope of the curves is 1). Different samples deviate from linearity at different values of input CO 2 …”

“…Effective solutions for reducing the concentration of CO 2 in the atmosphere are: energy-efficiency enhancement, including building design [2] and urban planning [3,4], reduction of CO 2 emissions exploiting renewable energy resources [5], and carbon capture and sequestration [6,7]. The CO 2 removal with adsorption-based techniques can be easily pursued for several applications thanks to their low operational requirements, ease of control, and high efficiency [8].…”