2008
DOI: 10.1139/z08-042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon- and nitrogen-isotope tissue–diet discrimination and turnover rates in deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus

Abstract: The dietary habits of most small mammals are not well documented, and stable isotope measurements can provide information on when and how diets change. Here we document the discrimination and turnover times for carbon and nitrogen isotopes in blood, liver, muscle, hair, and milk from deer mice ( Peromyscus maniculatus (Wagner, 1845)) fed a controlled diet. Nonbreeding adults and pregnant females were livetrapped, maintained on a commercial laboratory chow, and had tissues sampled on a regular schedule. After a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
62
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
62
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these findings differ from those recorded for deer mice (Miller et al 2008), whereby muscle tissue turned over faster than whole blood. Again, these results are perplexing given that both experiments employed similar methodology.…”
Section: Turnover Rates Of Carbon Isotopescontrasting
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, these findings differ from those recorded for deer mice (Miller et al 2008), whereby muscle tissue turned over faster than whole blood. Again, these results are perplexing given that both experiments employed similar methodology.…”
Section: Turnover Rates Of Carbon Isotopescontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…The tissue-discrimination values for carbon isotopes determined here for liver, muscle, and hair of white-footed mice are similar to those reported by Miller et al (2008) for the closely related deer mouse with one exception; the d 13 C discrimination value of whole blood in this experiment was determined to be 1.6% lower than that calculated for the deer mouse. This difference is surprising given that in both experiments, mice were fed diets with similar constituents, proteins of comparable biological value and similar carbon isotope ratios (-19.4% ± 0.3% in the Miller et al (2008) study and -19.7% ± 0.3% in the current study).…”
Section: Discrimination Factors For Carbon and Nitrogen Isotopessupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations