2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11676-015-0164-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon and nitrogen mineralization in soil of leguminous trees in a degraded pasture in northern Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were similar to Araújo et al (2001), Gonçalves et al (2001) and Barreto et al (2010), who found that the amount of mineralized C was lower during the first incubation days. In the same vegetation cover as in the present study, Nunes et al (2015) showed that the C mineralization curve fit the exponential model, and that there was still C available for mineralization by microorganisms after 20 weeks of incubation. The curves also showed that maceration generally increased the amount of C mineralized in the macroaggregates.…”
Section: -5supporting
confidence: 73%
“…These results were similar to Araújo et al (2001), Gonçalves et al (2001) and Barreto et al (2010), who found that the amount of mineralized C was lower during the first incubation days. In the same vegetation cover as in the present study, Nunes et al (2015) showed that the C mineralization curve fit the exponential model, and that there was still C available for mineralization by microorganisms after 20 weeks of incubation. The curves also showed that maceration generally increased the amount of C mineralized in the macroaggregates.…”
Section: -5supporting
confidence: 73%
“…Although the Stanford & Smith model is the most widely used to model organic waste mineralized carbon (MARTINES et al, 2006;NUNES et al, 2016;ANDRADE et al, 2016), Table 3 shows that it was not the most appropriate model in any situation compared with the Cabrera and Juma models, since the AICc value was higher in all cases. Thus, we based the inference for potentially mineralizable carbon (C 0 ) on the Juma model, as its confidence intervals for the C 0 parameter did not overlap for doses 6, 12, 24, and 36 Mg ha −1 (Tables 2, 4, 5, and 6), showing that the higher the applied dose, the greater the amount of potentially mineralizable carbon.…”
Section: According To Table 2 In the Stanfordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest sustainability is related to nutrient cycling in order to enhance their return to the trees, with the accumulated litter being an important source of nutrients for the trees in the forest ecosystem, because as the leaves, branches and roots are incorporated into the litter and undergo the decomposition process, they release nutrients to the soil and, consequently, are available to trees (BARRETO et al, 2010;GODINHO et al, 2014). In addition, planting tree species is an alternative for recovering degraded areas (NUNES et al, 2016), however, little is known about natural ecosystems and nutrient cycling in native forests and forest plantations in Brazil (GODINHO et al, 2014;MORAIS et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonlinear model most used to describe the dynamics of carbon in the soil is Stanford and Smith (ANDRADE;ANDREAZZA;CAMARGO, 2016;ANDRADE et al, 2015), including litter decomposition data (BARRETO et al, 2010;NUNES et al, 2016). It is a model with two parameters that represent the potentially mineralizable carbon and the mineralization constant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%