2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10329-021-00940-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon and nitrogen stable isotopic offsets between diet and hair/feces in captive orangutans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Suess effect was considered, and 1.5‰ was subtracted from δ 13 C values of fossil specimens (Friedli et al, 1986) to compare modern fecal δ 13 C with fossil δ 13 C values. Typical error ranges of isotopic offsets between diet and apatite (Malone et al, 2021) and between diet and feces (Tsutaya, Ogawa, et al, 2021) are also shown…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Suess effect was considered, and 1.5‰ was subtracted from δ 13 C values of fossil specimens (Friedli et al, 1986) to compare modern fecal δ 13 C with fossil δ 13 C values. Typical error ranges of isotopic offsets between diet and apatite (Malone et al, 2021) and between diet and feces (Tsutaya, Ogawa, et al, 2021) are also shown…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The Louys and Roberts (2020) data set consists of previously reported data (Bacon et al, 2018; Bocherens et al, 2017; Pushkina et al, 2010; Qu et al, 2014) and newly obtained data from paleontological and historical orangutan fossil specimens from the Pleistocene and Holocene in Southeast/East Asia. In this study, carbon isotope offset values of diet–bioapatite and diet–feces were set as −11.8‰ (Malone et al, 2021) and − 1.84‰ (Tsutaya, Ogawa, et al, 2021), respectively, adopting ratios reported in previous literature. The Suess effect was considered when comparing fecal δ 13 C with fossil δ 13 C, and 1.5‰ was subtracted from ratios of fossil specimens (Friedli et al, 1986).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, it is labor intensive as well as cost expensive and often uses large amounts of water that could or should be considered biohazardous waste. It may also be for the latter reason that the few studies that conducted dry sieving before isotope analysis were those on captive primates housed in zoos under veterinary care, in which aerosols from dried feces do not pose a considerable health risk (Reitsema, 2012; Tsutaya et al, 2017, 2021). Even more importantly for the study of wild primates, systematic wet sieving of fecal matter requires rather large sample amounts of >15 g, often much more than what primatologists can cost‐effectively store and later transport out of the field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%