2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2012.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon background and ionization yield of an AMS system during 14C measurements of microgram-size graphite samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To investigate AMS performance on graphite targets produced with the ultra-small reactors, a large suite of primary and secondary 14 C standards spanning a mass range of 6-100 µg C were prepared and measured on a single wheel, CFAMS041513. We do not observe the same rapid collapse in 12 C + beam current reported by Santos et al (2007) and Liebl et al (2013) with ultra-microscale graphite targets produced on <4 mg of reduced iron catalyst ( Figure 6). From our 6 and 25 µg C targets, produced with 2.5 mg of catalyst, we were able to obtain 6-10 individual measurements, each lasting 3 min or 30,000 14 C counts, whichever came first.…”
Section: Beam Current Yield From Ultra-small Graphite Targetssupporting
confidence: 46%
“…To investigate AMS performance on graphite targets produced with the ultra-small reactors, a large suite of primary and secondary 14 C standards spanning a mass range of 6-100 µg C were prepared and measured on a single wheel, CFAMS041513. We do not observe the same rapid collapse in 12 C + beam current reported by Santos et al (2007) and Liebl et al (2013) with ultra-microscale graphite targets produced on <4 mg of reduced iron catalyst ( Figure 6). From our 6 and 25 µg C targets, produced with 2.5 mg of catalyst, we were able to obtain 6-10 individual measurements, each lasting 3 min or 30,000 14 C counts, whichever came first.…”
Section: Beam Current Yield From Ultra-small Graphite Targetssupporting
confidence: 46%
“…Methods for samples in solution were initially developed for processing DNA in aqueous solution (Bergmann et al 2012) and the most extensive studies were carried out for this material (Liebl et al 2010, 2013). The smallest sample, measured with an overall precision of 2.4%, was a 4.7 µg C DNA sample (2.2 µg C extracted as CO 2 ).…”
Section: Sample Preparation Of µG Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3]), this may be called the second revolution of radiocarbon dating (the first was atom counting versus decay counting). Small AMS facilities such as the mini radiocarbon dating system MICADAS in Zurich [4] occupy a floor space of less than 10 m 2 , which is comparable to the space requirement for a standard mass spectrometer.…”
Section: -P2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here only a few microgram of DNA were available for the 14 C AMS measurements, demanding a particular careful sample preparation in every step from the human tissue to the final carbon sample [3]. Figure 6 shows that very little if any new neurons were formed in the human olfactory bulb after birth [21], in stark contrast to rodents where 50% turnover in adulthood has been observed.…”
Section: Dating Human Dna With the 14 C Bomb Peakmentioning
confidence: 99%