1999
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1999.106407.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon balance of a whole tomato plant and the contribution of source leaves to sink growth using the CO2 steady‐state feeding method

Abstract: To clarify the entire carbon balance of a young tomato plant and the contribution of each leaf to sink growth, the carbon balance of each leaf was quantitatively measured using the CO2 steady‐state feeding method to quantitatively measure the photosynthesis, translocation, distribution and respiration of newly fixed C. The entire carbon balance of the whole plant was calculated by adding the data of each leaf. The total amount of carbon fixed by all source leaves was 70.2 mg. Of this amount, in a 24‐h period, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shishido et al (1988Shishido et al ( , 1999 reported in tomato that leaf position determines which source leaf will contribute to the growth of each particular sink. They suggested that phyllotaxis and the arrangement of the vascular system were related to the distribution of photoassimilates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shishido et al (1988Shishido et al ( , 1999 reported in tomato that leaf position determines which source leaf will contribute to the growth of each particular sink. They suggested that phyllotaxis and the arrangement of the vascular system were related to the distribution of photoassimilates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect could result from different allocation patterns of C fixed by well-lit and shaded leaves, and a difference between the two leaf categories in the d 13 C of photosynthate produced by them. In a 14 C-labelling study with tomato Shishido, Kumakura & Nishizawa (1999) observed that lower leaves allocated relatively more C to roots than upper leaves; whereas upper leaves allocated relatively more C to the shoot apex. Photosynthetic 13 C-discrimination in sun leaves is less than in shaded leaves, leading to more negative d 13 C of assimilate produced by shaded than by well-lit leaves (LeRoux et al 2001;Baldocchi & Bowling 2003).…”
Section: Contrasting Respiratory Fractionation In Shoots and Rootsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The 13 C abundance of each organ was regarded as sink specifi c activity, and dry weight of sink was calculated as sink size. The RSS was calculated by dividing the sink strength of an individual organ by the sum of sink strengths of the whole spur, and the result expressed as a percentage of the total (Shishido et al, 1999;Treder and Kubik, 2000). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Leaf Flower Fruit and Shoot Typementioning
confidence: 99%