The narrative sustainable building is core message of European politics. Strategies discussed in this regard concern above all material minimization by using new more efficient manufacturing technologies, new form finding approaches for load-bearing structures or new high-performance materials. The goal of the research project V2.10, funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, refers to the latter by assessing the sustainability potential of building components made of innovative textile reinforced concrete. We conceptualized a life cycle sustainability assessment framework and applied it to variants of sandwich wall systems made of carbon concrete composites and steel-reinforced concrete. Results indicate hotspots in technology and material choices that could be addressed by circular strategies, for example, refuse, reduce or recycling. Overall, one design variant made of carbon concrete composites is the best performing with respect to all dimensions of sustainability. K E Y W O R D S carbon concrete composites, life cycle assessment, life cycle sustainability assessment, social life cycle assessment, textile reinforced concrete 1 | INTRODUCTION A committed path to sustainable construction, by including the entire life cycle of built materials and antecedent design processes, 1,2 is essential to diminish adverse negative effects on the nine planetary boundaries, 3 above all in cities. 4,5 Overall, alone buildings are responsible for 90% of used mineral resources, 40% of consumed primary energy, and 35% carbon emissions 6 while contributing to about 9% in European Union's GDP. 7 For quite some time, the planetary boundary climate change has attracted great attention by policy-makers, for example, the European Parliament called for a "climate neutral Europe by 2050." 8 With its continued "EU Circular Economy Action Plan" 8 as of March 2020, the EU-COM further addresses the need to align resource scarcity and a much wider bunch of externalities related to raw material use with environmental strategies along nine "Rs." 9,10 These strategies encompass initiatives for, for example, remediating maintenance ("R0 Refuse"), savings in raw materials ("R2 Reduce"), reusing the product ("R3 Re-use") or establishing closed material loops ("R8 Recycle"). These approaches are consistent with the international ambitions of achieving Sustainable Development Goals #9 to #13. 11 The European Construction Products Regulation already requests, among others, to consider reuse and recyclability of the construction