1967
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-328x(00)83735-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon compounds of the transition metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Initial coordinates for the non-H atoms were those obtained in the previous determination (Mills & Nice, 1967). These were refined to near convergence with anisotropic displacement parameters for all non-H atoms by a full-matrix least-squares method and all H atoms were located from the resulting Ap map.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Initial coordinates for the non-H atoms were those obtained in the previous determination (Mills & Nice, 1967). These were refined to near convergence with anisotropic displacement parameters for all non-H atoms by a full-matrix least-squares method and all H atoms were located from the resulting Ap map.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the unit cell obtained it was clear that this was not the case and a search of the Cambridge Structural Database showed that the crystals were in fact [Cp2Ru2(CO)4], (1), which is a possible side product in the synthesis of CpRuCI-(CO)2, and was evidently present as a contaminant in the sample of the dicarbonyl used to prepare the 'metalloligand'. Noting that the original structure determination for (1) (Mills & Nice, 1967) was of low…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) reveals that the complex has a trans conformation with two bridging carbonyl ligands. Similar to the cyclopentadienyl analog trans-[g 5 -CpRu(CO)(l-CO)] 2 [17] (where Cp = cyclopentadienyl ligand), both the structures are trans form and have Table 2 Selected bond distances (Å ) and angles (°) for 3 [20]. This distance is comparable to those found in other substituted cyclopentadienyl ruthenium dicarbonyl dimers [21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The Ru-Ru bond distance is 0.2738(2) nm. The Ru-Ru Bond distance is slightly longer than that in trans-[g 5 -CpRu(CO)(l-CO)] 2 [2.735(2) Å ][17], but slightly shorter than that in trans-[g 5 -CpMe 4 i hexRu(CO)(l-CO)…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Low-temperature crystallization made possible isolation of the cis form [10]. However, only the trans-bridged structure of crystalline II was detected by the X-ray and neutron diffraction methods [11,12].…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%