1976
DOI: 10.2320/matertrans1960.17.630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Diffusivity in Iron-Chromium Alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore thermal segregation calculations using a simple McLean type model are approximately consistent with observed grain boundary solute enrichments in the irradiated condition; indeed, in the case of P the simple models predict even higher concentrations than observed in this study [44]. However, thermal segregation depends on kinetics, as well as thermodynamics, hence on the entire alloy time-temperature history and solute diffusion properties [44][45][46]; and only interstitial C is expected to be fully equilibrated. Further, thermal non-equilibrium segregation (TNES), due to flow of excess quenched-in vacancies to boundaries, may also occur [47] along with other complications not treated in simple pure binary alloy Langmuir-McLean type models [43].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Therefore thermal segregation calculations using a simple McLean type model are approximately consistent with observed grain boundary solute enrichments in the irradiated condition; indeed, in the case of P the simple models predict even higher concentrations than observed in this study [44]. However, thermal segregation depends on kinetics, as well as thermodynamics, hence on the entire alloy time-temperature history and solute diffusion properties [44][45][46]; and only interstitial C is expected to be fully equilibrated. Further, thermal non-equilibrium segregation (TNES), due to flow of excess quenched-in vacancies to boundaries, may also occur [47] along with other complications not treated in simple pure binary alloy Langmuir-McLean type models [43].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…[9,13,14] Nevertheless, the presence of these alloying elements in steel impedes the carburizing process. [13] In comparison, Cr and Mo decrease the carbon diffusivity in austenite, [4,15] though these elements accelerate the overall carburizing performance of steel. [13] These phenomena become more convoluted as the composition of alloy steels grows increasingly complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements of carbon diffusivity using diffusionannealed couples were studied by various researchers. [1][2][3]13,14] In their analyses, the coefficients of carbon diffusion were calculated from the concentration profiles using the Boltzmann-Matano method. [15] The driving force for diffusion is the concentration gradient between the components of the diffusion couples and/or the differences in carbon activities due to the effect of alloying.…”
Section: Available Methods For Measuring Carbon Diffusivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, the coefficient of carbon diffusion is determined from a model of a solid-solid diffusion couple. [1][2][3] The application of such models to carburizing invariantly introduces a certain level of approximation and uncertainty due to a rough, though convenient, assumption of constant surface concentration at the interface with time. More accurate modeling of the gascarburizing process must account for mass transfer from the carburizing gas atmosphere to the steel surface, the surface reaction, and further carbon diffusion into the steel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%