2017
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201700240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Dioxide Adsorption on CeO2(110): An XPS and NEXAFS Study

Abstract: The adsorption of CO on the surface of a CeO (110) bulk single crystal was studied by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) spectroscopy. The high-quality XPS and C K-edge NEXAFS data show that CO adsorbs as a carbonate species on both fully oxidized CeO (110) and partially reduced CeO (110). No evidence for the formation of a carboxylate (CO ) intermediate could be found. On the fully oxidized CeO (110) substrate, the carbonate decomposes upon heating to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In regard to physisorbed CO 2 , typically a signal at higher binding energies (∼292−294 eV) is expected in the C 1s spectrum. 70,71 While there is no evidence for this feature in the C 1s spectrum shown in Figure 6bii, from the O 1s spectrum, this CO 2 O 1s signal only accounts for 1.75 atom % of the sample. Moreover, the sensitivity factor for O 1s was set to 2.881 times that of C 1s for this measurement, and with the relative abundance of other carbon species in the sample, it is expected for such trace amounts of CO 2 to be undetected through the C 1s spectrum.…”
Section: Acs Sustainable Chemistry and Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In regard to physisorbed CO 2 , typically a signal at higher binding energies (∼292−294 eV) is expected in the C 1s spectrum. 70,71 While there is no evidence for this feature in the C 1s spectrum shown in Figure 6bii, from the O 1s spectrum, this CO 2 O 1s signal only accounts for 1.75 atom % of the sample. Moreover, the sensitivity factor for O 1s was set to 2.881 times that of C 1s for this measurement, and with the relative abundance of other carbon species in the sample, it is expected for such trace amounts of CO 2 to be undetected through the C 1s spectrum.…”
Section: Acs Sustainable Chemistry and Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…69 A closer inspection of the O 1s environment through the high resolution spectrum in Figure 6dii reveals at least two unique environments at 535.3 (1.75 atom %) and 532.8 eV (3.68 atom %), which could be assigned to physisorbed CO 2 and carbonate (C−O/CO) oxygen environments, respectively. 70 These oxygenated species are most likely related to the carbon feed within the sample and could also be from adventitious carbon contamination during the XPS measurement. In accordance with the O 1s data, O−CO, C O, and C−O environments are also observed in the C 1s spectrum at 289.0, 287.8, and 286.5 eV, respectively (Figure 6bii).…”
Section: Acs Sustainable Chemistry and Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is connected to the possibility of switching between Ce 4+ and Ce 3+ oxidation states and the corresponding ability to release and take up oxygen at the surface of the nanoparticles through the formation of oxygen vacancies. [3c,31a,81] Recently, the valence change from Ce 4+ and Ce 3+ has been observed by STEM in combination with spatially resolved EELS, and the extent of the reduced shells has been investigated as a function of particle size. [14a] It should be stressed that unambiguous conclusions could impossibly be drawn from 2D projection data only.…”
Section: D Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 A study on a CeO x (111) film by Lykhach et al, however, revealed that neither the presence of a transition metal nor hydroxyl groups is required for the re-oxidation of ceria up to CeO 1.90 to take place, even at room temperature. 15 It has to be noted that, while the re-oxidation of the oxide has been observed in case of the (111) oriented surface, the (100) and (110) surfaces of CeO 2Àx have been shown to not be re-oxidized by adsorbed CO 2 , 16,17 though exhibiting a strong interaction with CO 2 at low temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%