Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center 2010
DOI: 10.3334/cdiac/otg.clivar_line_p_2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Dioxide, Hydrographic and Chemical Data Obtained During the Time Series Line P Cruises in the North-East Pacific Ocean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10, the MLD anomaly clearly showed the typical pattern of ENSO events (Alexander et al, 2002), and the MLD was approximately 10 m deeper in 2008 than in 2003 in the region. CLIVAR Repeat Section Line P data provided by Miller et al (2010) showed that surface (< 10 m) DIC concentration in station P in February 2003 is about 35 µmol kg −1 lower than in February 2008. By using CO2SYS program (Lewis and Wallace, 1998;Robbins et al, 2010), the estimated pCO sea 2 difference between February 2003 and February 2008 in the region caused by the changes of surface DIC, TA, temperature and salinity, is about 14 µatm.…”
Section: Difference Of Pco Sea 2 Distributions During Enso Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10, the MLD anomaly clearly showed the typical pattern of ENSO events (Alexander et al, 2002), and the MLD was approximately 10 m deeper in 2008 than in 2003 in the region. CLIVAR Repeat Section Line P data provided by Miller et al (2010) showed that surface (< 10 m) DIC concentration in station P in February 2003 is about 35 µmol kg −1 lower than in February 2008. By using CO2SYS program (Lewis and Wallace, 1998;Robbins et al, 2010), the estimated pCO sea 2 difference between February 2003 and February 2008 in the region caused by the changes of surface DIC, TA, temperature and salinity, is about 14 µatm.…”
Section: Difference Of Pco Sea 2 Distributions During Enso Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details about the use of these data are presented in sections 3.1.1 and 3.3. The specific cruise data used in this analysis include Climate Variability and Predictability (CLIVAR) Line P16 North in 2006, CLIVAR Line P01 in 2007, and Line P cruises between 1994 applying Pacific Ocean Interior Carbon (PACIFICA) Database corrections when appropriate ( Figure 2, http://cdiac.ornl.gov/oceans/PACIFICA/) [Fukasawa et al, 2007;Feely et al, 2008Feely et al, , 2011Miller et al, 2010]. In addition, 1°optimally interpolated data fields from the 2013 World Ocean Atlas (WOA) are used herein and discussed in section 3.3 [Garcia et al, 2013a[Garcia et al, , 2013bLocarnini et al, 2013;Zweng et al, 2013].…”
Section: Repeat Hydrography Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For verification, we used DIC concentrations independently observed from research vessels at ocean time series stations: K2 (47°N, 160°E) [ Wakita et al ., ], KNOT (44°N, 155°E) [ Wakita et al ., ], Papa (50°N, 145°W) [ Miller et al ., ], and ALOHA (23°N, 158°W) [ Keeling et al ., ]. We downloaded the data from the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (http://cdiac.ornl.gov/oceans/).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global pCO 2 observations by other international institutes archived in such as the Surface Ocean CO 2 Atlas [Pfeil et al, 2013] and the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory database [Takahashi et al, 2013] were not used here, and including those data will be a next step. [Miller et al, 2010], and ALOHA (23°N, 158°W) . We downloaded the data from the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (http://cdiac.ornl.gov/oceans/).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%