2021
DOI: 10.3390/cosmetics8030056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Dioxide Laser Vulvovaginal Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) causes significant symptomatic aggravation that affects the quality of life (QoL). Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA), the hallmark of GSM, is managed with topical non-hormonal therapy, including moisturizers and lubricants, and topical estrogen application. Patients not responding/being unsatisfied with previous local estrogen therapies are candidates for a noninvasive modality. Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser therapy, especially the fractionated type (FrCO2), has drawn considerab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(187 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vaginal laser treatment was associated with improvement in atrophy symptom scores, as assessed by the VAS, principally for dryness and dyspareunia. 11,12,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Additionally, we observed improvements in objective tissue findings: VHIS, [20][21][22]26 VMV, 12,20,21,24 and urinary symptoms. of meta-analysis, lack of assessment of the risk of bias, and assessment of the quality of evidence observed in the systematic reviews are also reflections of this fragility.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturesupporting
confidence: 51%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Vaginal laser treatment was associated with improvement in atrophy symptom scores, as assessed by the VAS, principally for dryness and dyspareunia. 11,12,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Additionally, we observed improvements in objective tissue findings: VHIS, [20][21][22]26 VMV, 12,20,21,24 and urinary symptoms. of meta-analysis, lack of assessment of the risk of bias, and assessment of the quality of evidence observed in the systematic reviews are also reflections of this fragility.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturesupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Confidence in review findings was low in six reviews 11,12,[20][21][22]25 and critically low in three reviews 23,24,26 due to one or more critical…”
Section: Risk Of Bias Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations