2013
DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2013.777128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon dioxide rebreathing in respiratory protective devices: influence of speech and work rate in full-face masks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
53
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the mechanism by which these acute exercise alterations were afforded differs from conventional altitude training, similar responses have previously been described in environmental hygiene scenarios where external respirators are worn (26). In those situations, the addition of inspiratory and expiratory resistance, as well as dead space, contributes to reductions in R R and a small increase in V T (2,16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Although the mechanism by which these acute exercise alterations were afforded differs from conventional altitude training, similar responses have previously been described in environmental hygiene scenarios where external respirators are worn (26). In those situations, the addition of inspiratory and expiratory resistance, as well as dead space, contributes to reductions in R R and a small increase in V T (2,16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In this context, it is therefore perhaps not surprising that FFRs are known to adversely affect the comfort of the wearer in terms of, for example, lowered thermal comfort [ 1 3 ] and elevated CO 2 levels [ 4 , 5 ]. The decreased thermal comfort is mainly due to increased humidity and temperature inside the dead space of the FFR from respiration and thermal regulation, which together give rise to a significantly higher apparent temperature than the ambient under normal conditions; apparent temperatures around 53°C have been measured by Roberge et al [ 3 ] for ambient conditions of 22°C and 24% relative humidity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous health and safety standards for respiratory protective equipment state the level of CO 2 in the inspired air should not exceed 1%. [15][16][17] Therefore, HCWs considering use of the modified full-face snorkel mask should be aware that this option does not meet minimum safety standards for PPE, and may result in increased inspired CO 2 levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed rise in the FiCO 2 level for the full-face snorkel mask was substantial, and breached current health and safety regulations for respiratory PPE, which state that inspired CO 2 levels should not rise above 1%. [15][16][17] In terms of demographics, the age, gender, and ethnicity of participants evaluating the respiratory PPE options varied substantially. The age of participants ranged from 24 to 66 years old.…”
Section: Ergonomic Assessments and Qualitative Fit Testing Of Ppe Solmentioning
confidence: 99%