2010
DOI: 10.1029/2009jd012081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon dioxide retrievals from Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment solar occultation measurements

Abstract: The Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE) satellite (SCISAT‐1) was launched into an inclined orbit on 12 August 2003 and is now recording high signal‐to‐noise 0.02 cm−1 resolution solar absorption spectra covering 750–4400 cm−1 (2.3–13 μm). A procedure has been developed for retrieving average dry air CO2 mole fractions in the altitude range 7–10 km from the SCISAT‐1 spectra. Using the N2 continuum absorption in a window region near 2500 cm−1, altitude shifts are applied to the tangent heights retrieved in v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the fundamental band, fits to measurements reported by Lafferty et al (1996) were used, whereas for the rotational band, absorption coefficients have been taken from molecular simulations by Borysow and Frommhold (1986). These standard approximations have been used for example by Buehler et al (2006) to assess the accuracy of radiative transfer codes compared to measurements or by Rinsland et al (2010) for retrieving telluric CO 2 profiles based on satellite data.…”
Section: Atmospheric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the fundamental band, fits to measurements reported by Lafferty et al (1996) were used, whereas for the rotational band, absorption coefficients have been taken from molecular simulations by Borysow and Frommhold (1986). These standard approximations have been used for example by Buehler et al (2006) to assess the accuracy of radiative transfer codes compared to measurements or by Rinsland et al (2010) for retrieving telluric CO 2 profiles based on satellite data.…”
Section: Atmospheric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This correction is applied to all occultations and is described in more detail in Foucher et al (2009). Using a method similar to that described in Foucher (2009), Rinsland et al (2010 find ACEretrieved CO 2 mean tropospheric concentration for the layer 7-10 km around 405-420 ppm, too high by about 30 ppm. This large bias is likely due to the use of an uncorrected N 2 continuum absorption.…”
Section: Ace-fts Pointing Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Foucher et al (2009) andFoucher (2009) have shown that the ACE-FTS instrument is able to provide CO 2 vertical profiles in the 5-25 km altitude range with an estimated CO 2 total error characterized by a bias of about ±1 ppm and a standard deviation of about 2 ppm after averaging over 20 spatially and temporally consistent retrieved profiles. Rinsland et al (2010), using ACE-FTS and a method similar to that of Foucher et al (2009), have retrieved average dry air CO 2 mole fractions in the layer 7-10 km but did not extend their study to the retrieval of profiles. Beagley et al (2010), again using ACE-FTS, have retrieved CO 2 profiles in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere where the problem of pointing knowledge uncertainties is not a concern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retrieval of CO 2 and tangent height in this work builds on previous algorithm development by , Foucher (2009), Foucher et al (2009Foucher et al ( , 2011, and Rinsland et al (2010). As discussed by , below ∼ 43 km, tangent heights (THs) cannot be accurately determined from the geometric information (satellite position and instrument viewing angle) and thus atmospheric observables are exploited for this purpose.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We begin the error budget description with a review of the available literature on error analysis for ACE-FTS CO 2 retrieval. Rinsland et al (2010) retrieved the partial column of CO 2 in the 7-10 km range and determined the error contribution due to several important sources such as measurement noise, temperature profile, nitrogen continuum absorption coefficients, CO 2 line intensities, aerosol absorption, CO 2 isotopologue correction, ACE-FTS ILS (instrument line shape) function, and TH shift. Foucher et al (2009Foucher et al ( , 2011 and Foucher (2009) also presented error budget information that considered measurement noise, parameter uncertainties (p and T profiles and tangent height errors), uncertainties in the VMRs of other species as well as model and spectroscopic error.…”
Section: Error Budget -Ace-ftsmentioning
confidence: 99%