2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-15100-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon-efficient closed-loop supply chain network: an integrated modeling approach under uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early research focuses on developing deterministic single objective optimization models for either minimizing the system operating cost or maximizing the total profit (Govindan et al 2015). However, recent studies emphasize the balance among different sustainable indicators with multi-objective optimization models (Govindan et al 2016;Yu and Solvang 2018), the proper formulation and treatment of uncertainties (Fattahi and Govindan 2017;Soleimani et al 2021;Yu and Solvang 2016), the improvement of the models' computational efficiency (Afra and Behnamian 2021;Alshamsi and Diabat 2017), and the management of different stakeholders (Gu et al 2019).…”
Section: Reverse Logisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early research focuses on developing deterministic single objective optimization models for either minimizing the system operating cost or maximizing the total profit (Govindan et al 2015). However, recent studies emphasize the balance among different sustainable indicators with multi-objective optimization models (Govindan et al 2016;Yu and Solvang 2018), the proper formulation and treatment of uncertainties (Fattahi and Govindan 2017;Soleimani et al 2021;Yu and Solvang 2016), the improvement of the models' computational efficiency (Afra and Behnamian 2021;Alshamsi and Diabat 2017), and the management of different stakeholders (Gu et al 2019).…”
Section: Reverse Logisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10] Foreign studies such as Soleimani et al (2021) applied the Augmented Weighted Chebyshev (AWT) method and the e-constraint method to address the multi-objectivity of the problem, while the robust optimization method was used to deal with the uncertainty of demand, which provided effective solutions for designing a green closed-loop supply chain network. [11] Choudhary et al (2020) used a combined approach of Best-Worst Method (BWM) and Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) to identify "Total Quality Management" and "Cleaner Production Technology" as the most important causal dimensions of environmentally sustainable supply chain management. [12] Ramanathan et al (2020) used case study observations from three global companies to develop a conceptual model and conducted a questionnaire survey to test the conceptual model, and the results indicated that the environmental positioning (green objectives) of the companies would enhance their business and financial performances.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first analyzed the status of four indicators of financial indicators, resource indicators, operational indicators and environmental indicators of six provinces and one city in East China separately. The performance status of each individual indicator of green development of logistics industry in each province and city in East China from 2015 to 2019 was calculated according to the formula (1) to (11), and its specific relative closeness (score) and ranking are shown in Table 2 and Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 below. From Figure 1, it can be seen that the economic development of logistics industry in East China held a stable growth trend in general from 2015 to 2019, among which Shandong Province leads other provinces and cities with an absolute advantage, and its rise is the largest, followed by Zhejiang Province, Jiangsu Province, Fujian Province, Anhui Province, Shanghai City, and Jiangxi Province.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Single Indicator Of Green Development Of Logis...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lin noted that the WA model of Tiwari et al [45] yields objectives involving heavy weights with relatively greater achievement values. However, the proportion of the achievement levels is not essentially the same as that of the objective weights [20,44,46]. To solve the present SCPLCC problem, the following equations corresponding to Lin's weighted max-min model were employed [20]:…”
Section: Weighted Max-min Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%