Carbon emissions trading and corporate green investment: The perspective of external pressure and internal incentive

Abstract

The carbon emissions trading scheme (CETS) is an important institutional innovation that internalizes external costs caused by corporate carbon emissions and promotes firms to engage in green development. Based on a 2009–2019 sample of Chinese enterprises of heavily polluting industries listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) and Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE), this paper employs the difference‐in‐differences model to examine the effect of CETS on corporate green investment and discuss the moderating effects of external pressure and internal incentive. We find that the implementation of CETS significantly promotes corporate green investment, and this finding still holds after a series of robustness tests such as Propensity Score Matching‐Difference in Differences (PSM‐DID) method and alternative measure of green investment. The heterogeneity analysis indicates that the positive effect of CETS is stronger in large‐scale enterprises, state‐owned firms, and companies located in regions with strict environmental regulation. In addition, less local government intervention and more internal executive compensation incentive significantly enhance the positive impact of CETS on corporate green investment.

Is corporate green investment a determinant of corporate carbon emission intensity? A managerial perspective

“…This thesis explores the impact of corporate green investment on carbon emission intensity at the micro level. Referring to previous studies on the determinants of carbon emissions, such as Chen et al [ 85 ] and Chen et al [ 86 ], which concluded that equity concentration has a negative impact on corporate fulfillment of environmental responsibility, and that the nature of equity also exerts a heterogeneous effect on corporate environmental behavior, this study includes the proportion of the top ten shareholders' shareholdings and the nature of equity as control variables. In addition, because it is firm-level data, we again control for firm-specific relevant variables, drawing on the studies of Albitaret al [ 87 ] and Gerged et al [ 88 ] on carbon emissions.…”

Navigating Carbon Offsetting: How User Expertise Influences Digital Platform Engagement

“…This presents a crucial environmental challenge that requires immediate attention [2]. The actions of both individuals and organizations are key factors contributing to the escalation of GHG emissions [3,4]. There are numerous adverse effects associated with climate change, including extreme weather events, that require proactive responses [1].…”

“…However, it is important to understand that there may be differences between expert users and regular users in their utilization of these platforms, as platforms tend to leverage the knowledge of expert users [12]. Equally important is the awareness of climate change in our daily lives and practices, including our reliance on digital technologies and information management, which have been recognized as crucial contributors to energy consumption and carbon emissions [3,13].…”

“…This paper confronts the pressing issue of the climate emergency, emphasizing the escalating greenhouse gas emissions [3]. To mitigate these effects, collective action is imperative [4,14].…”

Investing for a Greener Future: Asymmetric Nexus between Green Finance and Renewable Energy Technology Innovation

“…Conventional financing sources, such as banks and private investors, often shy away from these initiatives due to perceived risks and uncertainties. [6,7] However, GF offers incentives for enterprises to implement environmentally friendly practices. The introduction of GB has created a new avenue of financing dedicated to supporting long-term projects in the RE sector.…”