2013
DOI: 10.3926/jiem.570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Footprint estimation for a Sustainable Improvement of Supply Chains: State of the Art

Abstract:

Purpose: This paper examines the current methodologies and approaches developed to estimate carbon footprint in supply chains and the studies existing in the literature review about the application of these methodologies and other new approaches proposed by some authors.

Design/methodology/approach: Literature review about methodologies developed by some authors for determining greenhouse gases emissions throughout the supply chain of a given sector or organization. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained in this case study show the viability of a win-win relationship that several researchers (Atilgan & Azapagic, 2016;Battini, Calzavara, Persona & Sgarbossa, 2016;Carter & Rogers, 2008;Cordero, 2013;Garza-Reyes, Villarreal, Kumar & Molina-Ruiz, 2016) have found in the past. According to this approach, adopting environmentally sustainable policies may have a positive impact on cost reduction.…”
Section: Discussion and Further Researchsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results obtained in this case study show the viability of a win-win relationship that several researchers (Atilgan & Azapagic, 2016;Battini, Calzavara, Persona & Sgarbossa, 2016;Carter & Rogers, 2008;Cordero, 2013;Garza-Reyes, Villarreal, Kumar & Molina-Ruiz, 2016) have found in the past. According to this approach, adopting environmentally sustainable policies may have a positive impact on cost reduction.…”
Section: Discussion and Further Researchsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This is due to the existence of many different emission factors related to each process. In addition, Cordero (2013) remarked that literature is scarce regarding methodologies for carbon footprint calculation in several models of supply chain. Both facts lead to obtain different conclusions depending on the sources consulted and the methodologies applied when evaluating the environmental impact of packaging strategies.…”
Section: Discussion and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a few conceptual frameworks, theoretical models, measurement methods and benchmarking of supply chain CF have also been developed. One can find these conceptual models in Sundarkani et al (2010), Rizet et al (2012), Hitchcock (2012), Dasaklis and Pappis (2013), Koh et al (2013), Kuo (2013), Cordero (2013), Acquaye et al (2014), Velazquez-Martinez et al (2014), Farmery et al (2014), Frizelle and Casali (2014), Court et al (2015), Ingrao et al (2015), Montoya-Torres et al (2015) and Nakajima et al (2015). Despite such standard guidelines, there is a lack of specific standard guidelines for product, corporate and national level CF accounting.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the organizations focused on direct carbon emissions, but indirect emission can also increase their CFP. Cordero (2013) prepared a literature review that examined how existing technologies and strategies could calculate the CFP over a supply chain. This paper also discussed different cost-effective decisions.…”
Section: 21mentioning
confidence: 99%