Carbon Footprinting and Pricing Under Climate Concerns

Abstract

<jats:p> This article studies how organizations should design a product by choosing the carbon footprint and price in a market with climate concerns. The authors first show how the cost and demand effects of reducing the product carbon footprint determine the profit-maximizing design. Paradoxically, they find that stronger climate concerns may increase the overall corporate carbon footprint, even if the product itself is greener. Next, the authors establish that offsetting carbon emissions can create a win-win outcome for the firm and the climate if the cost of compensation is sufficiently low. Third, the authors show how regulation in the form of a cap-and-trade scheme or a carbon tax affects product design, firm profitability, and green technology adoption. Finally, the authors extend the analysis to a competitive scenario. Overall, these results can help marketing professionals by offering insight into how to address climate concerns through improved product design. </jats:p>

Understanding the Use of Carbon Credits by Companies: A Review of the Defining Elements of Corporate Climate Claims

“…Our review yielded six articles offering high-level appraisals of corporate carbon claims from various perspectives. This included an economic modelling exercise that analyzed why firms engage in carbon offsetting; [23] a critical reflection on voluntary carbon offsetting as a mechanism for climate governance; [83] and an analysis of the feasibility and credibility of carbon markets in the context of the Paris Agreement. [4] In addition, the paper by Fankhauser et al [6] revisits the science behind net zero and reflects on how to make it a successful framework for corporate climate governance, while Hale et al [3] systematically appraise the robustness of the net-zero goals of, among others, the 2000 largest publicly-traded companies.…”

“…With the increasing stakeholder preference for sustainable brands, products and services, [30] some companies feel compelled to overstate their climate performance for reputational gains and increased market share [23] -a practice typically referred to as "greenwashing." [45][46][47] As definitions of greenwashing vary between stakeholders, and greenwashing is widely acknowledged to take on various forms and vary in its degree, it may be difficult to ascertain with confidence when greenwashing is taking place and whether it is indeed intentional.…”

“…ACCR also affirmed that Santos had portrayed its natural gas operations as "clean energy" and thus misled the public as to the "nature, characteristics and suitability of its primary product." [61] Finally, unsubstantiated climate claims pose regulatory risks to companies, as they are increasingly triggering the scrutiny of financial, competition and consumer authorities, [23] some of which have already imposed administrative sanctions. At the international level, this includes the greater use of nonjudicial grievance mechanisms for addressing unfounded and misleading corporate claims, such as OECD's grievance mechanism under the Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.…”

An Economist’s Guide to Climate Change Science

“…The Holocene temperature record reveals a long-term decline, caused by slow variations in Earth's orbit, that began around 5,500 years ago (Marcott, Shakun, Clark, and Mix 2013). 2 The post-1850 reconstruction from direct observations reveals that this decline was interrupted in the 20th century, by a rise totaling about 1.0°C from the late-19th to the early-21st century (Rohde et al 2013). This rise, which is superimposed by a spectrum of higher-frequency variability, some internal to the climate system and some driven by changes in forcing, is well-explained by the response to human-caused emissions.…”

Forecasting the volatility of European Union allowance futures with time-varying higher moments and time-varying risk aversion

“…First, from the perspective of demand, when the climate changes, residents' demand for carbon products will increase. The increased consumption demand of carbon products will promote the production increase of enterprises, and the sales volume of carbon emission products will increase until the carbon emission reaches the upper limit, so as to speed up the development of the carbon market (Bertini et al, 2020). Secondly, from the perspective of supply, when the climate changes extremely, raw materials cannot be supplied in time, which leads to the rise of carbon emission costs.…”