“…Unfortunately, there are still plentiful challenges in the large-scale commercial manufacture of PIBs on account of the large size effect of K ions (1.38 Å) much more than that of Li ions (0.76 Å). Until now, many cathode materials of PIBs have been proposed mainly including Prussian blue and its analogues, layered transitional metal oxides, polyanionic compounds, and organic cathodes. − A number of late-model cathode materials such as some 2D or 3D metal organic frameworks and covalent organic frameworks were also applied as cathode materials of PIBs. − Among them, layered potassium vanadium oxides have inspired further development because of their superior air stability, suitable K + transport channel, and high redox potential with easy fabrication, mainly including K 0.486 V 2 O 5 , K 0.5 V 2 O 5 , K 0.83 V 2 O 5 , K 2 V 8 O 21 , K 2 V 3 O 8 , and so on. , For instance, the typical vanadium-based metal oxide (K 0.486 V 2 O 5 ) has been regarded as one of the competitive alternatives with a high average potential of 3.2 V together with a high K-ion theoretical specific capacity of ∼120 mAh g –1 . Nevertheless, the larger K + makes the volume variation of PIBs in the charge/discharge processes more violent than other alkali metal ions, resulting in the collapse of the crystal structure and even delivering the powdering of the electrodes. − Meanwhile, the lower transfer capability of K + in the bulk phase of the electrode material restricts its high-rate performance.…”