“…For instance, TAP has been used to quantify the number of active sites present on catalysts, 36 and these were found to be in agreement with previously published steady-state isotopic transient kinetic analysis diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (SSITKA DRIFTS) results. 43 Other examples of correlation/complementation of TAP experiments with other methods include electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy, 44,45 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), 44,46,47 X-ray diffraction (XRD), 44,46,48 X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), 44,47 Raman, 46 energy dispersive X-ray scanning transmission electron microscopy (EDX-STEM), 46 high angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM), 48,49 Fourier transfer Infrared (FTIR), 49 high resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) 47,50,51 and prompt gamma-ray activation analysis (PGAA). 52 As such, while many reports have been dedicated solely to TAP, it should be noted that TAP is not a necessarily standalone characterization technique and can/should be used in a complimentary way with other methodologies.…”