2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40974-016-0015-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon implications of China’s urbanization

Abstract: China recently announced a plan to move an unprecedented large number of rural residents to cities over a relative short period of time; i.e., potentially more than 100 million people would move to China's cities by 2020 potentially leading to large increases in energy consumption and CO 2 emissions. By applying environmentally extended input-output analysis, in this study we estimate the carbon footprint of Chinese urban and rural residents and assess the carbon implications of China's urban migration plan. O… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent analysis of household carbon footprints in the U.S. found no evidence that increasing population density in urban cores or suburbs creates net greenhouse gas emissions benefits when considering entire metropolitan areas (Jones and Kammen 2014). In China, urban households produce more than twice as much CO 2 per capita as rural households, resulting in the increased carbon emissions that have accompanied China's urban transition (Feng and Hubacek 2016). Scaling of energy use and CO 2 emissions with city size in the U.S., China, and Europe is either linear (directly proportional to population) or super-linear (larger per capita emissions in larger cities; Bettencourt et al 2007, Fragkias et al 2013, Oliveira et al 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent analysis of household carbon footprints in the U.S. found no evidence that increasing population density in urban cores or suburbs creates net greenhouse gas emissions benefits when considering entire metropolitan areas (Jones and Kammen 2014). In China, urban households produce more than twice as much CO 2 per capita as rural households, resulting in the increased carbon emissions that have accompanied China's urban transition (Feng and Hubacek 2016). Scaling of energy use and CO 2 emissions with city size in the U.S., China, and Europe is either linear (directly proportional to population) or super-linear (larger per capita emissions in larger cities; Bettencourt et al 2007, Fragkias et al 2013, Oliveira et al 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total emissions are obtained by summing direct CO 2 emissions and indirect CO 2 emissions [56]. The direct CO 2 emissions mainly refer to the consumption of coal, oil, gas, electricity, and heat from China energy statistical yearbook, while the indirect CO 2 emissions are caused by the consumption of products and services, which is also named embodied emissions [40,72].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct energy consumption refers to the end use of energy, such as for lighting and space heating. Indirect energy, also referred to as "embodied energy," is the amount of energy use throughout the production of goods and services used by households [55,56]. The framework of household CO 2 emissions accounting is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Household Co 2 Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban regions are limited to 2% of the total global surface area, but are responsible for >75% of energy consumption and carbon emissions [23][24][25][26][27]. Studies suggest that various factors responsible for energy consumption and carbon emissions may be economic growth, industrial restructuring, and many other factors [27][28][29]. Urbanization results in the accumulation of individuals and commercial events and hence promotes global environmental problems [29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%