Carbon information disclosure quality, greenwashing behavior, and enterprise value

Abstract

As global warming becomes increasingly prominent, countries worldwide advocate for a low-carbon economy to cope with the pressure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The Chinese government has proposed a “dual carbon” goal of peaking carbon emissions by 2030 and becoming carbon neutral by 2060. The disclosure of carbon information by Chinese enterprises has attracted widespread attention from society. This study selects the constituents of the Social Responsibility Index of China Shanghai Stock Exchange from 2016 to 2020 as samples to empirically analyze the relationship between the level of carbon information disclosure and corporate value, and the moderating effect of greenwashing behavior. Results indicated that the quality of carbon disclosure is positively correlated with the enterprise value. Greenwashing behavior promotes the positive impact of carbon disclosure quality on enterprise value in the short run, but this promoting effect fades in the long run. We further found that the carbon information disclosure of non-heavy-pollution enterprises has a more obvious positive impact on enterprise value than that of heavily polluting enterprises. Additionally, the positive impact of carbon information disclosure on enterprise value is more visible among enterprises in a good legal environment than those in a poor legal environment. This study enriches the relevant literature on carbon information disclosure and enterprise “greenwashing” behavior and has practical significance for promoting China’s low-carbon development in the context of ecological civilization and improving the enthusiasm for the quality of enterprise carbon information disclosure.

What induces corporations to engage in controversial marketing and environmental practices? A linguistic perspective

“…That is, the future seems to be more distant and distinct to firms with strong FTR languages than it is to firms using weak FTR languages (Chi et al, 2020). Such "short-termism" is expected to induce firms which use strong-FTR languages to be more opportunistic and less concerned about the negative future consequences of their decisions (Kim et al, 2021), thus predisposing these firms to engage in more controversial marketing and environmental practices to maximise near-term benefits (Cao et al, 2022;Sohyun et al, 2022;Tipton et al, 2009). Cheng et al (2022) and other previous studies have demonstrated that firms in countries with strong-FTR languages are more likely to engage in deviant financial practices that maximise short-term performance despite the risk of potential future adverse consequences, such as damage to the corporation's reputation.…”

“…Such “short-termism” is expected to induce firms which use strong-FTR languages to be more opportunistic and less concerned about the negative future consequences of their decisions (Kim et al. , 2021), thus predisposing these firms to engage in more controversial marketing and environmental practices to maximise near-term benefits (Cao et al. , 2022; Sohyun et al.…”

The European (Green?) Deal: a systematic analysis of environmental sustainability

“…In the private sphere, the demand for climate certifications—that is, climate or carbon neutral—is growing, although climate neutrality does not necessarily imply sustainability (Birkenberg & Birner, 2018). Additionally, there is growing mistrust among consumers due to past improper claims and green washing from enterprises (Birkenberg & Birner, 2018; Cao et al, 2022).…”

Why does excessively exquisite packaging hinder consumers to buy circular products? a perspective of signaling theory

“…As green products are more and more valued by consumers, the marketing of various green products by manufacturers often makes it impossible for consumers to judge whether a product is a green product, causing green confusion. Greenwashing is when a business only promotes its green image without any real green product attributes (Cao et al, 2022). Manufacturers promote their green image without any green product attributes which may confuse consumers' evaluation of circular products.…”