2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.113914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon input manipulations affecting microbial carbon metabolism in temperate forest soils – A comparative study between broadleaf and coniferous plantations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results also suggested soil NH 4 -N and total P content strongly associated with soil fungal and bacterial communities in broadleaf forests, but not in coniferous forests. This suggested that the relationship between soil microbial communities and soil properties can be different between boreal broadleaf and coniferous forests, which is consist with previous observations in temperate 45 and subtropical forests 46 . Another interesting result is that, soil fungal and bacterial communities in these southern boreal broadleaf and coniferous forests are significantly associated with soil total or available K content.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Results also suggested soil NH 4 -N and total P content strongly associated with soil fungal and bacterial communities in broadleaf forests, but not in coniferous forests. This suggested that the relationship between soil microbial communities and soil properties can be different between boreal broadleaf and coniferous forests, which is consist with previous observations in temperate 45 and subtropical forests 46 . Another interesting result is that, soil fungal and bacterial communities in these southern boreal broadleaf and coniferous forests are significantly associated with soil total or available K content.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In addition to litter manipulation experiments (litter removal and litter addition treatments), we further classified straw harvesting and residue removal in cropland as "litter removal", straw mulching with the equivalent of annual aboveground litter production as controls (e.g. Akhtar et al 2018b;Wang et al 2019), but straw mulching in excess of the annual aboveground litter production as "litter addition" (e.g. de Abreu Sousa Junior et al 2018;Zhang et al 2015a).…”
Section: Data Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response of soil C to altered litter inputs is probably largely determined by the tree species grown in each plantation. For example, Wang et al (2019) found that doubling aboveground litter inputs significantly increased soil C content and metabolism of labile C in oak plantations but not in pine plantations. In addition, plantation management practices will strongly influence the response of soil C to changes in litter inputs, for example, by altering soil nutrient availability (Zhao et al 2017), via straw harvesting (Blazier et al 2008) or thinning (Jandl et al 2007).…”
Section: Responses Of Soil C Content and Stocks To Altered Abovegroun...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data derive from an investigation undertaken to see the influence of detritus input and removal treatments on carbon metabolism in broadleaf and coniferous plantations [1]. Soil microbial C metabolism was measured with Biolog EcoPlate™, which was incubated at 25 °C for 240 h. The absorbance was measured with a micro plate reader (Synergy H 1 , Biotek, Vermont, USA) at 590 nm every 12 h. The data included the average absorbance data of triplicates every 12 h for 240 h for 50 soil samples.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%