1989
DOI: 10.1016/0146-6380(89)90009-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon isotope effects associated with autotrophic acetogenesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

18
148
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
18
148
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, the carbon isotopic composition of acetate (δ 13 C-acetate) and ɛ ma can be estimated by mass balance using the data of δ 13 C-CH 4 and δ 13 C-CO 2 . Assuming the mass balance δ 13 C-acetate values to be representative of the δ 13 C value of the substrate, the average fractionation factor of CH 4 produced by acetoclastic methanogenesis (ɛ ma ) in this study's experiments at stationary phase is -12.05 ‰ ± 5.2 (Tables 4, 5, 6), which is in agreement with ε c values for acetate fermentation determined in other methanogenic microbial cultures (Gelwicks et al, 1994;Goevert and Conrad, 2009;Krzycki et al, 1987;Penning et al, 2006). However, if the ɛ ma values of samples that showed typical apparent isotopic fractionation of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis are excluded (samples 5, 6 and 8 in Table 4 and sample 1 in Table 5), the average ɛ ma is -10.34 ‰ ± 2.1, which is quite similar to ɛ ma -10.2 ‰ that was observed for acetate metabolism by Methanosaeta concilii (Penning et al, 2006).…”
Section: Carbon Isotopessupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As such, the carbon isotopic composition of acetate (δ 13 C-acetate) and ɛ ma can be estimated by mass balance using the data of δ 13 C-CH 4 and δ 13 C-CO 2 . Assuming the mass balance δ 13 C-acetate values to be representative of the δ 13 C value of the substrate, the average fractionation factor of CH 4 produced by acetoclastic methanogenesis (ɛ ma ) in this study's experiments at stationary phase is -12.05 ‰ ± 5.2 (Tables 4, 5, 6), which is in agreement with ε c values for acetate fermentation determined in other methanogenic microbial cultures (Gelwicks et al, 1994;Goevert and Conrad, 2009;Krzycki et al, 1987;Penning et al, 2006). However, if the ɛ ma values of samples that showed typical apparent isotopic fractionation of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis are excluded (samples 5, 6 and 8 in Table 4 and sample 1 in Table 5), the average ɛ ma is -10.34 ‰ ± 2.1, which is quite similar to ɛ ma -10.2 ‰ that was observed for acetate metabolism by Methanosaeta concilii (Penning et al, 2006).…”
Section: Carbon Isotopessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…It has been noted that ε values tend to remain constant for each diagenetic environment, and as such, are indicative of a particular methanogenic pathway. For samples that produced α c = 1.02, the corresponding ε c values were in the range of -17 ‰ to -24 ‰, which are in agreement with ε c values for acetate fermentation determined in other methanogenic microbial cultures (Gelwicks et al, 1994;Goevert and Conrad, 2009;Krzycki et al, 1987;Penning et al, 2006).…”
Section: Fractionation Factor For Determining Methanogenesis Pathwaysupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assuming an average isotopic fractionation (i.e., e acetate/CO2 ) of -57% (Gelwicks et al, 1989;Heuer et al, 2010;Blaser et al, 2013), we would expect acetogenesis to produce acetate with d 13 C-values around -59% in the mofette soil, where d 13 C CO2 is on average -1.95±0.06% (Bräuer et al, 2004). However, the observed d 13 C of pore-water acetate ranged from -33.6% to -13.9%.…”
Section: Bacterial Groups Assimilating Volcanic Comentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We estimated the relative contribution of hydrogenotrophic and acetoclastic methanogenesis according to Conrad (2005) by using the d 13 C values of CH 4 , CO 2 and acetate, and isotopic fractionations of -71.8±8.8% (e CH4/CO2 ; for hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis in Methanoregulaceae dominated sediment (Liu et al, 2013) and -21% (e CH4/Acetate ; for acetoclastic methanogenesis by a pure culture of Methanosarcinaceae (Gelwicks et al, 1994). The contribution of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis increased in the mofette soil from 5% in 5 cm to 44% in 10 cm depth.…”
Section: Bacterial Groups Assimilating Volcanic Comentioning
confidence: 99%