2007
DOI: 10.5714/cl.2007.8.4.285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Material from Natural Sources as an Anode in Lithium Secondary Battery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 using CF-FC30 sample. G, D and D 00 peaks could be observed at 1573-1591, 1343-1354 and 1462-1497 cm À1 [14][15][16][17]. Comparing Fig.…”
Section: Structure Analysismentioning
confidence: 68%
“…3 using CF-FC30 sample. G, D and D 00 peaks could be observed at 1573-1591, 1343-1354 and 1462-1497 cm À1 [14][15][16][17]. Comparing Fig.…”
Section: Structure Analysismentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In literature, hard carbons have been prepared by pyrolyzing the different precursor materials like cotton wool, isotropic pitches, rise husk, natural sources, epoxy novolac resins and various other polymers (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7). These hard carbons show much higher reversible capacity (400-700 mAh g -1 ) than that of graphite (372 mAh g -1 ) (2-7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[2][3][4][5] In literature, hard carbons have been prepared by pyrolyzing different precursor materials like cotton wool, rice husk, tea leaves, isotropic pitches, epoxy novolac resins, and various other polymers. [6][7][8][9][10][11] These hard carbons show much higher reversible capacity (400-700 mAh g −1 ) than that of graphite (372 mAh g −1 ). However, large irreversible capacity, average cyclic stability and hysteresis during charging and discharging for hard carbons limit their use in commercial lithium-ion batteries to secondary choice after graphitic carbons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%