Forages 2020
DOI: 10.1002/9781119436669.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Metabolism in Forage Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to AM-cut SSG, M- and PM-cut SSG had higher ( P < 0.05) DM contents, which could be linked to the loss of morning dew. SSG accumulates sucrose as the principal reserve carbohydrate ( 16 ). It was accountable for the increases in WSC contents with the delay of harvest time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to AM-cut SSG, M- and PM-cut SSG had higher ( P < 0.05) DM contents, which could be linked to the loss of morning dew. SSG accumulates sucrose as the principal reserve carbohydrate ( 16 ). It was accountable for the increases in WSC contents with the delay of harvest time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starch concentration increased by the same pattern as WSC in alfalfa, with significant upregulation after drought events and the second recovery (Figure 3b); however, different effect on the content of starch was detected for hybrid fescue. One of its reasons could be the different form of carbohydrates accumulation, because, according to Volenec and Nelson (2020), the primary form of non‐structural carbohydrates in cold‐season grasses is fructan in roots, which concentration was not determined in our study. On the other hand, despite negligible initial drought effect on starch, its concentration significantly increased after the first recovery and reduced after the second one in fescue (Figure 3f).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…On the other hand, despite negligible initial drought effect on starch, its concentration significantly increased after the first recovery and reduced after the second one in fescue (Figure 3f). Reduction in the pool of storage carbohydrates (fructan and/or starch) was also observed in drought‐treated sorghum (Sarshad et al, 2021) as well as perennial ryegrass and tall fescue (Karsten & MacAdam, 2001), bluegrass (Yang et al, 2013) during recovery after drought and it was associated with the usage of storage carbohydrates for re‐growth and post‐drought recovery as well as hydrolysation of polymers for osmotic adjustment (Volenec & Nelson, 2020). Therefore, reduced starch content after the second recovery in hybrid fescue (Figure 3f) might be responsible for inhibited growth, but simultaneously increased content of WSC and drought‐resistance during the same period of re‐watering (Figure 2c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations