2010
DOI: 10.1155/2010/319527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Monoxide as an Electron Donor for the Biological Reduction of Sulphate

Abstract: Several strains of Gram-negative and Gram-positive sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are able to use carbon monoxide (CO) as a carbon source and electron donor for biological sulphate reduction. These strains exhibit variable resistance to CO toxicity. The most resistant SRB can grow and use CO as an electron donor at concentrations up to 100%, whereas others are already severely inhibited at CO concentrations as low as 1-2%. Here, the utilization, inhibition characteristics, and enzymology of CO metabolism as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inhibition may be because of adverse effects of CO on metalloenzymes, such as hydrogenases, with which CO can competitively form stable complexes that block the interactions of substrate and enzymes (35). Compared with the reported CO concentrations [1-2%, 7.5%, and 50-100% (vol/vol)] that cause severe inhibition to other anaerobes with hydrogenases, the severe CO toxicity level of strain 195 [6 μmol per bottle, (∼0.1%) (vol/vol)] is orders-of-magnitudes lower (36,37). This extreme CO toxicity is likely one reason that growth of axenic D. mccartyi cultures is observably unreliable (20)(21)(22)(23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The inhibition may be because of adverse effects of CO on metalloenzymes, such as hydrogenases, with which CO can competitively form stable complexes that block the interactions of substrate and enzymes (35). Compared with the reported CO concentrations [1-2%, 7.5%, and 50-100% (vol/vol)] that cause severe inhibition to other anaerobes with hydrogenases, the severe CO toxicity level of strain 195 [6 μmol per bottle, (∼0.1%) (vol/vol)] is orders-of-magnitudes lower (36,37). This extreme CO toxicity is likely one reason that growth of axenic D. mccartyi cultures is observably unreliable (20)(21)(22)(23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For instance, sulfate reducing, Fe(II)- and sulfide-oxidizing, and phototrophic bacterial activities may be exploited for removal of SO 2 (Dasu et al, 1993; Huber and Stetter, 1998; Pandy et al, 2005; Parshina et al, 2005, 2010), though these activities have not been considered in the context of existing FGD systems. Given the high operating temperatures associated with FGD units, thermophilic microorganisms would be best suited for biotechnological approaches to FGD and SO 2 removal (Huber and Stetter, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the exception of some Desulfotomaculum species that can grow in Ͼ50% CO, CO is toxic at concentrations of Ͻ20% to most sulfate-reducing bacteria (21). CO toxicity is likely to be a result of inhibition of hydrogenases or other metalloenzymes (21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CO toxicity is likely to be a result of inhibition of hydrogenases or other metalloenzymes (21). CO has been demonstrated to be both produced and consumed by Desulfovibrio spp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%