Carbon monoxide levels and rates of consumption after changing to low tar and nicotine cigarettes

Prue, Donald M.; Scott, Reda R.; Martin, John E.; Lomax, BL

doi:10.1016/0005-7967(83)90200-0

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Shipley, Rosen, & Williams, 1982). However, the introduction of low-T/N cigarettes and public campaigns that advocated their use for nonabstainers fostered the development of a variety of controlled-smoking treatment programs (Foxx & Axelroth, 1983; Foxx & Brown, 1979; Frederiksen & Peterson, 1976; Glasgow, Klesges, Godding, & Gegelman, 1983; Jaffe et al, 1978; Prue, Krapfl, & Martin, 1981; Prue, Scott, Martin, & Lomax, 1983). All of these programs were designed to motivate subjects to reduce the T/N yields of their cigarettes, although some encouraged reductions in individual parameters that were presumably related to smoke exposure (e.g., rate, amount smoked).…”

Section: Use Of Biochemical Assessment In Three Areas Of Smoking Rese...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Cigarette brand switching: Relating assessment strategies to the critical issues.

McMorrow

Foxx²

1985

Psychological Bulletin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The debate regarding what occurs when people switch to low-tar and low-nicotine cigarettes encompasses three research issues (i.e., risk reduction, nicotine regulation, and compensation), and each requires a different assessment strategy. Yet many studies have failed to differentiate these issues and have offered conclusions that are based on questionable inferences regarding exposure to specific smoke constituents. This article relates the various assessment strategies to the critical issues in cigarette brand switching by: (a) tracing the development of current assessment strategies and clarifying the relative strengths of mouth-level, machine-based, behavioral, and biochemical measures, (b) reviewing a variety of biochemical assessments including carbon monoxide, thiocyanate, nicotine, and cotinine, (c) examining the utility of these measures in risk reduction, nicotine regulation, and compensation studies, and (d) suggesting future directions.

show abstract

Section: Use Of Biochemical Assessment In Three Areas Of Smoking Rese...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Cigarette brand switching: Relating assessment strategies to the critical issues.

McMorrow

Foxx²

1985

Psychological Bulletin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Behavioral and biochemical effects of gradual reductions in cigarette yields in pregnant and nonpregnant smokers

Kabela

Andrasik

1988

Addictive Behaviors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Carboxyhemoglobin and thiocyanate as biomarkers of exposure to carbon monoxide and hydrogen cyanide in tobacco smoke

Scherer

2006

Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology

111

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Carbon monoxide levels and rates of consumption after changing to low tar and nicotine cigarettes

Cited by 4 publications

References 25 publications

Cigarette brand switching: Relating assessment strategies to the critical issues.

Cigarette brand switching: Relating assessment strategies to the critical issues.

Behavioral and biochemical effects of gradual reductions in cigarette yields in pregnant and nonpregnant smokers

Carboxyhemoglobin and thiocyanate as biomarkers of exposure to carbon monoxide and hydrogen cyanide in tobacco smoke

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About