2014
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201311225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon‐Monoxide‐Releasing Molecules for the Delivery of Therapeutic CO In Vivo

Abstract: The development of carbon-monoxide-releasing molecules (CORMs) as pharmaceutical agents represents an attractive and safer alternative to administration of gaseous CO. Most CORMs developed to date are transition-metal carbonyl complexes. Although such CORMs have showed promising results in the treatment of a number of animal models of disease, they still lack the necessary attributes for clinical development. Described in this Minireview are the methods used for CORM selection, to date, and how new insights in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
230
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 298 publications
(234 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
230
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike most common drugs whose pharmacological action is dependent on their interaction with a macromolecular target and whose potency is dictated by the stability of the drug-target complex, CORMs exert their therapeutic action via the liberated CO molecules. [1][2][3][4][5] However, apart from the common scientific consensus that CORM-based therapy should not lead to significant carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) formation and to the inhibition of respiratory enzymes that are sensitive to CO, it is questionable whether CORMs should release CO slowly or rapidly and what kinetics of CO release is most advantageous for therapeutic applications. There are only few reports clearly showing the advantages of CORMs slowly releasing CO over those releasing CO instantly 6,7 and they relate to the anti-platelet effects of CORMs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike most common drugs whose pharmacological action is dependent on their interaction with a macromolecular target and whose potency is dictated by the stability of the drug-target complex, CORMs exert their therapeutic action via the liberated CO molecules. [1][2][3][4][5] However, apart from the common scientific consensus that CORM-based therapy should not lead to significant carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) formation and to the inhibition of respiratory enzymes that are sensitive to CO, it is questionable whether CORMs should release CO slowly or rapidly and what kinetics of CO release is most advantageous for therapeutic applications. There are only few reports clearly showing the advantages of CORMs slowly releasing CO over those releasing CO instantly 6,7 and they relate to the anti-platelet effects of CORMs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] Although several stimulus-responsive composites have been investigated in biological applications at the nanoscale,there have been few reports of functionalizing the composites in living cells. [16,17] Delivery of carbon monoxide (CO) into living cells represents ac hallenging task [18] and could possibly be achieved by applying protein assemblies involving metal complexes.M etal carbonyl complexes have been used as carbon-monoxide-releasing molecules (CORMs) for both in vitro and in vivo delivery of CO for the purpose of investigating the function of CO as an intracellular signaling molecule. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the controlled delivery and release of the toxic gas in aqueous environments, carbon monoxide-releasing molecules (CORMs) have proven to be the most promising for therapeutic usage (27,28). Transition metal carbonyl complexes are the most prominent CORMs because they can be triggered via light, solvent exchange on the metal coordination sphere, and enzymes (29,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%