2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon nanomaterials induce residue degradation and increase methane production from livestock manure in an anaerobic digestion system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is no obvious difference in gas production between adding 0.1 g/L MWCNTs modified CF and adding pristine CF. The total gas production of the high‐loaded MWCNTs (1 g/L) was close to that of the control group, possibly due to the damage caused by the direct contact of cells with MWCNTs [29–30] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there is no obvious difference in gas production between adding 0.1 g/L MWCNTs modified CF and adding pristine CF. The total gas production of the high‐loaded MWCNTs (1 g/L) was close to that of the control group, possibly due to the damage caused by the direct contact of cells with MWCNTs [29–30] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The total gas production of the high-loaded MWCNTs (1 g/L) was close to that of the control group, possibly due to the damage caused by the direct contact of cells with MWCNTs. [29][30] shows the gas production rate in before 20 h, and it can be concluded that the rate of gas production of the CF modified with 0.5 g/L MWCNTs was higher than that of the CF group before 14 h and lower than that of the CF group after 14 h. One reason may be there is no effective connection between the MWCNTs and the CF surface, which leads to the exfoliation and aggregation of MWCNTs. Aggregated carbon nanotubes cannot act as mediators of intercellular electron conduction and may cause damage to cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, AD has shown less influence on air quality than other technologies and is conducive to minimizing carbon emission [41]. Single or mixed organic solid waste can act as a substrate for anaerobic digestion [42,43]; thousands of related studies have been published [44][45][46]. However, it is worth noting that some digestates rich in heavy metals, microplastics (MPs), and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) cannot be directly used for agriculture or forestry and should be further disposed of by other methods [47][48][49].…”
Section: Classical Organic Solid Waste Treatment Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crop straw and human-livestock-poultry manure (CSHLPM) are the main waste types used in agricultural production activities. During the development of traditional agriculture for thousands of years, our ancestors also realized the value of CSHLPM as a fertilizer resource [ [1] , [2] , [3] ]. CSHLPM is rich in nutrients, such as N, P 2 O 5 and K 2 O, which are necessary for the growth of various types of crops.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%