2017
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b04938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Nanoparticle Hybrid Aerogels: 3D Double-Interconnected Network Porous Microstructure, Thermoelectric, and Solvent-Removal Functions

Abstract: We report reduced graphene oxide (rGO)/single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) hybrid aerogels with enhanced thermoelectric (TE) performance and removal of organic solvents by designing 3D double-interconnected network porous microstructures. A convenient, cost-effective, and scalable preparation procedure is proposed compared with conventional high-temperature pyrolysis and supercritical drying techniques. The obtained hybrid aerogels are systematically characterized by apparent density, scanning electron micro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ideal TE materials should have a high Seebeck coefficient, high electrical conductivity, and low thermal conductivity [60]. However, from the above analysis, we see that these parameters are not independent of each other: the Seebeck coefficient is typically inversely proportional to the electrical conductivity; the thermal conductivity is proportional to the electrical conductivity [61]. The development of high TE performance materials is generally a process of decoupling the three key parameters.…”
Section: Basic Description Of the Three Key Parameters For Te Matementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideal TE materials should have a high Seebeck coefficient, high electrical conductivity, and low thermal conductivity [60]. However, from the above analysis, we see that these parameters are not independent of each other: the Seebeck coefficient is typically inversely proportional to the electrical conductivity; the thermal conductivity is proportional to the electrical conductivity [61]. The development of high TE performance materials is generally a process of decoupling the three key parameters.…”
Section: Basic Description Of the Three Key Parameters For Te Matementioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Recently, many reports have been published on the enhancement of thermoelectric properties of composite materials by co-synthesis with carbon-based materials. [18][19][20][21][22] Examples include the addition of singlewalled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) to a Bi 2 Te 3 matrix to enhance its thermoelectric properties, incorporation of graphene in a Bi 2 Te 3 nanowire matrix to enhance its electrical conductivity while reducing the thermal conductivity, 23 and the addition of SWCNTs to Ag 2 Te to enhance its power factor. 24 In the case of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), Khasimsaheb et al 25 reported an enhancement of power factor and ZT of PbTe nanocubes upon the addition of MWCNT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TE performance of these materials are generally evaluated by a dimensionless figure of merit ( ZT ), ZT = S2σk T, where S , σ, k , and T stand for the Seebeck coefficient or thermopower, the electrical conductivity, the thermal conductivity, and the absolute temperature, respectively. In cases of low thermal conductivities for the neat polymers and their composite materials, their TE performance is always evaluated by power factor (PF = S 2 σ) . Very regretfully, the performance evaluation for the flexible TE devices is confused in the available literatures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Very regretfully, the performance evaluation for the flexible TE devices is confused in the available literatures. In cases of low thermal conductivities for the neat polymers and their composite materials, their TE performance is always evaluated by power factor (PF = S 2 σ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%