2017
DOI: 10.3934/dcdss.2017008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon-nanotube geometries: Analytical and numerical results

Abstract: We investigate carbon-nanotubes under the perspective of geometry optimization. Nanotube geometries are assumed to correspond to atomic configurations which locally minimize Tersoff-type interaction energies. In the specific cases of so-called zigzag and armchair topologies, candidate optimal configurations are analytically identified and their local minimality is numerically checked. In particular, these optimal configurations do not correspond neither to the classical Rolled-up model [5] nor to the more rece… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By reducing to nearest-neighbor interactions, it can nonetheless be checked to be a local minimizer, under specific assumptions on the interaction potentials [23]. This stability analysis allows to tackle other carbon nanostructures as well, including nanotubes [11,17,18], fullerenes [12,23], diamond [23], carbyne stratified configurations [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By reducing to nearest-neighbor interactions, it can nonetheless be checked to be a local minimizer, under specific assumptions on the interaction potentials [23]. This stability analysis allows to tackle other carbon nanostructures as well, including nanotubes [11,17,18], fullerenes [12,23], diamond [23], carbyne stratified configurations [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanotubes with µ = µ us will be referred to as unstretched nanotubes. The aim of [55,56] was to prove that G α us is a local minimizer. This has been illustrated numerically in [55] and checked analytically in [56], for a restricted class of perturbations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of [55,56] was to prove that G α us is a local minimizer. This has been illustrated numerically in [55] and checked analytically in [56], for a restricted class of perturbations. Our stability result Theorem 3.3 below delivers an analytical proof of stability with respect to all small perturbations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations