Environmental Effects of Afforestation in North-Western Europe 2007
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4568-9_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Sequestration in Soil and Biomass Following Afforestation: Experiences from Oak and Norway Spruce Chronosequences in Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
45
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
6
45
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes in soil C storage have been reported from a number of studies based on stand chronosequences. In contrast to Vesterdal et al (2006), who found that soils can contribute about 30% of the total C sequestration in afforested ecosystems, we found that soil C content comprised the main proportion of the total C sequestration in this pine chronosequence.…”
Section: Storagecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in soil C storage have been reported from a number of studies based on stand chronosequences. In contrast to Vesterdal et al (2006), who found that soils can contribute about 30% of the total C sequestration in afforested ecosystems, we found that soil C content comprised the main proportion of the total C sequestration in this pine chronosequence.…”
Section: Storagecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This is attributed to the cumulative accumulation of mineral soil C that was transformed from the previous vegetation in to the soils through the decomposition and decay of dead litter, coarse wood debris, fine wood debris, dead roots and microbial activities, whereas the vegetation C itself is lost, since the plantations are managed on a commercial basis in which felled trees are extracted from the forests and converted into various forest products, such as timber, furniture, ply wood, boards, papers, etc. Many C sequestration investigations conducted in forest ecosystems reported the highest carbon storage in the mineral soil component, corresponding to our studies, consistent with the report of Dixon et al [11] regarding the soil pool forming the major part of forest C storage, but contradicted the findings of Vesterdal et al [55], who reported that soils contribute about 30% of the total C sequestration in an afforestation ecosystem. [13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Following afforestation, carbon stocks in the above-and below-ground plant biomass in planted forests increase significantly with forest age (Niu and Duiker 2006). Although soils accumulate less carbon at a slower rate than the aboveground biomass (Jandl et al 2007), soils can contribute approximately 30 % of the total carbon sequestered in afforested ecosystems, as suggested by a synthesis of afforestation chronosequences in northwestern Europe (Vesterdal et al 2006). Consequently, planted forests play an increasingly important role in carbon sequestration in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%