Carbon Storage Distribution Characteristics of Vineyard Ecosystems in Hongsibu, Ningxia

Zhang, Liang; Xue, Tingting; Gao, Feifei; Wei, Ruteng; Wang, Zhilei; Li, Hua; Wang, Hua

doi:10.3390/plants10061199

Cited by 11 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Increasing pyrolysis peak temperature significantly increased biochar TC content, probably due to volatilization losses of other elements, especially H and O, and confirmed results reported by Ippolito et al [46]. The average TC content in grapevine pruning residues was 44.5%, which is similar to other studies [49][50][51], where authors reported values from 44.1% to 47.8%. In biochar, the average TC content was 75.4%, which agrees with the results of other studies (73.5%) [50], while a recent study reported even lower TC content (69.4%) [52].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Biochar from Grapevine-Pruning Residues Is Affected by Grapevine Rootstock and Pyrolysis Temperature

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, the production and application of biochar as a soil amendment produced from pruning residues has gained attention worldwide. Since the effect of grapevine rootstock type on grapevine-pruning residues used as feedstock for biochar production had not yet been researched, the present research was performed. Two grapevine rootstocks, different in vigor, were selected, with the hypothesis that they would affect their chemical composition and, consequently, the composition of the produced biochar. In this work, grapevine-pruning residues of the indigenous variety “Istrian Malvasia” (Vitis vinifera L.) grafted on 420A and SO4 rootstocks were analyzed and used for biochar production under three peak temperature programs (400 °C, 500 °C, and 600 °C). Higher pyrolysis temperature decreased yield but increased EC, ash, and TC content, as well as the content of most of the studied elements. On the other hand, grapevine rootstock type affected biochar EC, ash content, and specific surface area. Results showed that a more vigorous rootstock affects the produced biochar qualities by enhancing the above-mentioned properties. The present research showed that biochar produced from grapevine-pruning residues, especially at 500 °C or 600 °C, could be a valuable tool for the valorization of this biomass as a soil amendment.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Biochar from Grapevine-Pruning Residues Is Affected by Grapevine Rootstock and Pyrolysis Temperature

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The site (37°61′N, 106°12′E; 1,350 m a.s.l.) is located in a hilly landscape (part of the Yellow River Basin, administratively belonging to Wuzhong, China) at an elevation of 1,240–1,450 m, in the Loess Plateau of China (Figure 3a) (Zhang et al., 2021). This area has a typical temperate continental arid climate with an annual average temperature of 9.2°C (maximum daily temperature of 29.7°C and minimum daily temperature of −14.2°C).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Solar Farms on Soil Erosion in Hilly Environments: A Modeling Study From the Perspective of Hydrological Connectivity

Liu,

Wu,

et al. 2023

Water Resources Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hydrological connectivity (HC) is a useful framework for understanding hydrological responses to landscape changes. We present herein a novel model (SOFAR) for utility‐scale solar farms (USFs), combining modules of soil moisture dynamics, roof effects of photovoltaic panels (PVs), vegetation growth and landform evolution. By augmenting the model with a DEM‐based HC index, we investigate hydrological behaviors following the construction of a USF in China's Loess Hilly Region. Nine scenarios are designed, to explore the effects of co‐evolving ecohydrology and landscape on soil erosion and HC in USFs deployed in different climates and terrains, by altering the annual precipitation, rainfall frequency, and ground slope. Our results show that the USF considerably increased runoff (99.18%–154.26%) during its operational period, and soil erosion rate (21.4%–74.84% and 25.35%–76.18%) and HC (0.08%–0.26% and 0.47%–0.91%) throughout construction and operational periods, respectively. The highest erosion rates were detected in the PV installation zones and in the areas close to the river channel. We prove the hypothesis that HC is a critical indicator for sediment yield in a USF, and thus the long‐term responses of soil erosion to USF installation and development can be explained in terms of HC. We conclude that USFs may increase soil erosion, mainly by increasing local HC and runoff, and higher background HC may in turn further aggravate the effects of USFs on soil erosion. Our results underscore the importance of including landscape ecohydrologic and geomorphic feedbacks, to improve the environmental impact assessment of USFs.

show abstract

“…As vineyards are a potential source of carbon storage [164], with differences among vine ages [165] and grape varieties [166], soil microorganisms are of great importance in regulating organic carbon dynamics [167], as taxa such as Patescibacteria, Synergistetes, Chloroflexi, Actinobacteria, Deinococcus-Thermus, and Atribacteria can degrade organic carbon to produce organic acids [168].…”

Section: Carbon Storagementioning

confidence: 99%

Microbiota Ecosystem Services in Vineyards and Wine: A Review

García-Izquierdo,

Colino-Rabanal,

Tamame

et al. 2024

Agronomy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The domestication of vines started in Asia 11,000 years ago, although it was not until the 19th century that oenology was established as a scientific discipline thanks to the research of Louis Pasteur on the role of microorganisms in wine fermentation. At the present time, the progression in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies is helping to facilitate the identification of microbial dynamics during winemaking. These advancements have aided winemakers in gaining a more comprehensive understanding of the role of microbiota in the fermentation process, which, in turn, is ultimately responsible for the delivery of provisioning (wine features and its production), regulating (such as carbon storage by vineyards, regulation of soil quality, and biocontrol of pests and diseases) or cultural (such as aesthetic values of vineyard landscapes, scholarly enjoyment of wine, and a sense of belonging in wine-growing regions) ecosystem services. To our knowledge, this is the first review of the state of knowledge on the role of microbiota in the delivery of ecosystem services in the wine sector, as well as the possibility of valuing them in monetary terms by operating logic chains, such as those suggested by the SEEA-EA framework. This paper concludes with a review of management practices that may enhance the value of microbiota ecosystem services and the role of smart farming in this task.

show abstract

Carbon Storage Distribution Characteristics of Vineyard Ecosystems in Hongsibu, Ningxia

Cited by 11 publications

References 54 publications

Biochar from Grapevine-Pruning Residues Is Affected by Grapevine Rootstock and Pyrolysis Temperature

Biochar from Grapevine-Pruning Residues Is Affected by Grapevine Rootstock and Pyrolysis Temperature

Effect of Solar Farms on Soil Erosion in Hilly Environments: A Modeling Study From the Perspective of Hydrological Connectivity

Microbiota Ecosystem Services in Vineyards and Wine: A Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About