2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(02)00002-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon storage of harvest-age teak (Tectona grandis) plantations, Panama

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
114
2
21

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
12
114
2
21
Order By: Relevance
“…We also compared the C storage potential of agroforests with that of plantations of teak, which is the most common form of reforestation in Panama (Kraenzel et al, 2003). The C stocks of harvest-age (20-year old) teak plantations are 120.2 Mg C ha -1 (including trees >10 cm DBH and their roots; Kraenzel et al, 2003).…”
Section: Reforestation For Long-term C Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also compared the C storage potential of agroforests with that of plantations of teak, which is the most common form of reforestation in Panama (Kraenzel et al, 2003). The C stocks of harvest-age (20-year old) teak plantations are 120.2 Mg C ha -1 (including trees >10 cm DBH and their roots; Kraenzel et al, 2003).…”
Section: Reforestation For Long-term C Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the researcher, however, the number of samples taken from a tree will vary. Nelson et al (1999) dried a single sample of the bole at breast height, while Kraenzel et al (2003) dried a separate sample for each meter of the bole's length. Moreover, the drying time and temperature varies between researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other authors have used a carbon concentration of 45% by weight (Whittaker and Likens, 1973). Occasionally, carbon is measured directly by burning the samples in a carbon analyzer (Kraenzel et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Woody biomass dry weight was assessed from stem timber volume based on the basic density of teak wood (0.54 Mg m -3 - Pérez & Kakkinen 2005). Further, a biomass expansion factor (1.33) was used to estimate the total aboveground biomass (leaves, branches, and stem) as a function of the stem biomass (Kraenzel et al 2003). Dry belowground biomass (roots and fine roots) was derived from the aboveground biomass using a shoot-root ratio of 0.16 (IPCC 2005); finally, the carbon content was estimated as a fraction (0.495) of the total dry biomass (see Tab.…”
Section: Carbon Storage From the Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, several models quantifying carbon stored in teak trees have been developed (Cubero & Rojas 1999, Kraenzel et al 2003, Gera et al 2011. However, to our best knowledge, no models have been developed for optimizing timber production and carbon sequestration in teak plantations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%