2017
DOI: 10.1002/er.3918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon supported bimetallic Ru-Co catalysts for H2 production through NaBH4 and NH3 BH3 hydrolysis

Abstract: Summary This work investigates the effect of the addition of small amounts of Ru (0.5‐1 wt%) to carbon supported Co (10 wt%) catalysts towards both NaBH4 and NH3BH3 hydrolysis for H2 production. In the sodium borohydride hydrolysis, the activity of Ru‐Co/carbon catalysts was sensibly higher than the sum of the activities of corresponding monometallic samples, whereas for the ammonia borane hydrolysis, the positive effect of Ru‐Co systems with regard to catalytic activity was less evident. The performances of R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deconvolution procedure ( Figure S1A) led to the distinction of three different components at around 199 °C, 246 °C and 314 °C, respectively. Reasonably, considering also the TPR quantification reported in Table S1, the low temperature feature at 200 °C can be attributed to the reduction of the Ru precursor shifted at higher temperature with respect to Ru/CeO2 due to a stronger metal-support interaction [37]; the signal at around 315 °C can be assigned to the reduction of ceria surface oxygen interacting with ruthenium and manganese oxide; and the feature at 245 °C is probably due to the reduction of manganese oxide species (Mn2O3 → Mn3O4) [36] overlapping with the reduction of dispersed RuOX particles on the surface of CeO2-MnOx. The Pd/CeO2-MnOx catalyst A quite sharp reduction peak at 435 • C characterizes the TPR profile of the CeO 2 -MnO x catalyst.…”
Section: Catalysts Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The deconvolution procedure ( Figure S1A) led to the distinction of three different components at around 199 °C, 246 °C and 314 °C, respectively. Reasonably, considering also the TPR quantification reported in Table S1, the low temperature feature at 200 °C can be attributed to the reduction of the Ru precursor shifted at higher temperature with respect to Ru/CeO2 due to a stronger metal-support interaction [37]; the signal at around 315 °C can be assigned to the reduction of ceria surface oxygen interacting with ruthenium and manganese oxide; and the feature at 245 °C is probably due to the reduction of manganese oxide species (Mn2O3 → Mn3O4) [36] overlapping with the reduction of dispersed RuOX particles on the surface of CeO2-MnOx. The Pd/CeO2-MnOx catalyst A quite sharp reduction peak at 435 • C characterizes the TPR profile of the CeO 2 -MnO x catalyst.…”
Section: Catalysts Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the open literature, many studies propose interesting highly efficient catalysts. [14][15][16] However, generally these catalysts are under powder form and are not compatible with process intensification (eg, continuous process). The main drawbacks with catalytic powders include high pressure drop, low catalyst recyclability and process engineering.…”
Section: Nabh 4 + 2h 2 O ! Nabo 2 + 4h 2 : ð1þmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] Sodium borohydride (SB), which has been reported in various hydrogen storage methods, has been considered the most promising for a solid hydrogen storage material due to its advantages such as high hydrogen content, high stability, flammability, and other hydrogen storage materials with a 10.8% by weight of hydrogen. 5,6 Because of the very slow hydrolysis of SB in aqueous solution without the presence of a catalyst, it is important to synthesize highly catalytic activating catalysts and use them in the hydrolysis of SB. Various metals for the hydrolysis of SB have used as well-known catalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%