2000
DOI: 10.1021/es990930m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Tetrachloride Degradation:  Effect of Microbial Growth Substrate and Vitamin B12 Content

Abstract: Microbial degradation kinetics of carbon tetrachloride (CT) under reducing conditions were investigated for different cultures, fed with 1,2-propanediol, dextrose, propionaldehyde, or acetate and nitrate, in the anaerobic step of an anaerobic/aerobic operation sequence. Methanogenesis was inhibited due to the aerobic step. CT biodegradation rates followed first-order kinetics with respect to CT concentration and biomass and were not affected by the presence of growth substrate. CT degradation rates increased l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The molar ratios used in this study were far lower than those evaluated previously. Zou et al (2000) observed 3-to 7-fold enhancement of CT degradation kinetics in enrichment cultures developed from anaerobic digester sludge with a molar ratio 2.3 CNB12:CT. A 10-fold increase in CT degradation rates was observed in DCM-enrichment cultures when a molar ratio of 0.1 CNB12:CT was applied (Hashsham et al 1995). A 30-fold enhancement in CT degradation rates were observed in pure cultures of the acetogenic bacterium, Acetobacterium woodii, when a molar ratio of 0.11 HOB12:CT was applied (Hashsham & Freedman 1999).…”
Section: Cobalamins As Redox Mediators During Ct-bioconversionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The molar ratios used in this study were far lower than those evaluated previously. Zou et al (2000) observed 3-to 7-fold enhancement of CT degradation kinetics in enrichment cultures developed from anaerobic digester sludge with a molar ratio 2.3 CNB12:CT. A 10-fold increase in CT degradation rates was observed in DCM-enrichment cultures when a molar ratio of 0.1 CNB12:CT was applied (Hashsham et al 1995). A 30-fold enhancement in CT degradation rates were observed in pure cultures of the acetogenic bacterium, Acetobacterium woodii, when a molar ratio of 0.11 HOB12:CT was applied (Hashsham & Freedman 1999).…”
Section: Cobalamins As Redox Mediators During Ct-bioconversionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The first steps in the metabolism of these substrates in many enteric bacteria involve, propanediol dehydratase, glycerol dehydratase and ethanolamine ammonia lyase; respectively, which are all adenosylcobalamin-dependent enzymes. The substrate, 1,2-propanediol has been used to stimulate vitamin B 12 production in methanogenic enrichment cultures (Zou et al 2000). These enrichment cultures were able to degrade CT, and the rates of CT-degradation rates were found to be proportional to intracellular levels of vitamin B 12 .…”
Section: Effect Of Primary Substratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first step in the catabolism is the conversion of 1,2-propanediol to propionaldehyde which is dependent on vitamin B 12 and thus the presence of 1,2-propanediol induces vitamin B 12 biosynthesis (Roth et al 1996). The use of 1,2-propanediol as a growth substrate stimulated vitamin B 12 production in an enrichment culture cycled between anaerobic/aerobic conditions, The increased vitamin B 12 production was correlated with increased rates of CT degradation (Zou et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative to maintaining and stimulating microbes in situ is the injection of microbiologically produced cofactors that are capable of dechlorinating these compounds. Researchers have found several cofactors (heme, vitamin B 12 , cofactor F 430 ) that can degrade CT, CF, and TCE (Burris et al, 1996;Buschman et al, 1999;Chiu and Reinhard, 1996;Gantzer and Wackett, 1991;Lin et al, 1989;Marks et al, 1989;Mazumder et al,1987;Mowder et al, 2000;Public Health Laboratory Service Board, 1989;Zou et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%