1958
DOI: 10.1021/ac60139a014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon-Type Composition of Viscous Fractions of Petroleum. Density-Refractivity Intercept Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The refractivity-intercept-density method of Kurtz et al (1958) is a triangular graphical relation between percentage carbon as aromatic, naphthenic, or paraffinic; refractivity intercept (R¡); and density. This method requires that the aromatic percentage must be known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The refractivity-intercept-density method of Kurtz et al (1958) is a triangular graphical relation between percentage carbon as aromatic, naphthenic, or paraffinic; refractivity intercept (R¡); and density. This method requires that the aromatic percentage must be known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of other procedures have been discussed in various sources (Boelhower et al, 1954;Kurtz et al, 1958Kurtz et al, , 1936Kurtz et al, ,1937Van Nes and Van Westen, 1951;Waterman et al, 1958). However, all of the existing methods are useful only for high-boiling virgin fractions and are accurate only for data on which the method is based.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical relations expressing molar volumes of normal paraffins in terms of chain length were presented by Huggins (J) and Calingaert (6). Kurtz and coworkers gradually expanded this empirical approach to encompass branched chains, unsaturations, and ring structures (7)(8)(9)(10). A graphical densimetric method was developed by van Krevelen for the structural analysis of coal (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= 16.28m + 13.15m + 9.7m -6.2m + 31.2 (7) where m = number of chain carbon atoms m = number of carbon atoms in rings m = number of carbon atoms at ring junctions m = number of double bonds 31.2 = terminal constant, or molecular increment of volume This equation is set up in terms of the type of carbon atoms and the number of double bonds but does not specifically provide terms for carbon atoms and hydrogen atoms as such. This general equation has been found very useful (9,10,28,43,44,50).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%