2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0008-6223(00)00195-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbonaceous contaminants on support films for transmission electron microscopy

Abstract: Evaporated carbon support films for transmission electron microscopy often contain carbonaceous contaminants. These include poorly graphitized carbon, fragments of graphite, and fullerene-like structures such as nanotubes and nanoparticles. In some cases, carbyne crystals may also be present. There are many examples in the carbon literature where these contaminants have been mistaken for sample material. This paper describes the kinds of contaminants observed on grids obtained from a number of commercial suppl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A few titanium (Ti) and zinc (Zn) oxide particles, as well as few pure C particles were encountered on the blank samples. They look similar to some carbonaceous particles being described as contaminants on TEM grids (Harris et al, 2001). However, these particles are different in both size and morphology compared to the carbonaceous particles observed in the impaction spot of the samples.…”
Section: Electron Microscopysupporting
confidence: 52%
“…A few titanium (Ti) and zinc (Zn) oxide particles, as well as few pure C particles were encountered on the blank samples. They look similar to some carbonaceous particles being described as contaminants on TEM grids (Harris et al, 2001). However, these particles are different in both size and morphology compared to the carbonaceous particles observed in the impaction spot of the samples.…”
Section: Electron Microscopysupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Figure (b) shows the HAADF image retaken after the EELS spectrum imaging, in which an increase in the thickness of the corona is clearly observed, indicating a buildup of a carbon-rich substance as a result of electron bombardment. It is known that electron beam irradiation especially at high electron dose that is normally required for EELS spectrum imaging can induce specimen contamination by formation of a carbonaceous layer on the sample surface. , However, these carbon-rich deposits formed by the specimen contamination do not contain a detectable O constituent, so it is clear that the corona does not come from a buildup of carbon contamination from electron beam damage. This can be easily identified by comparing the O map in Figure (e) with the STEM images in Figure (a, b), which show the HAADF images taken before and after the spectrum image 4­(c) was recorded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 nm, a small hollow core was surrounded by many layers of graphitic carbon. Subsequent work has shown that nanoparticles of this kind are sometimes found in the carbon support lms used for TEM (Harris 1997a(Harris , 2001. Therefore, the particles observed by Smith and Buseck may not have been part of the meteoritic carbon, but a contaminant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%