“…As described in Section 1, many of the previously published Δ 47 to temperature relationships lie in one of two main clusters: one cluster that resembles the equation initially derived by the group at Caltech (Ghosh et al, 2006a;Ghosh et al, 2007;Tripati et al, 2010Tripati et al, , 2015Thiagarajan et al, 2011;Grauel et al, 2013;Zaarur et al, 2013;Came et al, 2014;Kimball et al, 2015); and a second cluster that resembles an equation derived by the group at Harvard (Dennis and Schrag, 2010;Tang et al, 2014;Wacker et al, 2014;Defliese et al, 2015;Kimball et al, 2015;Kluge et al, 2015). Several possible explanations for these apparent calibration differences have been explored, such as the acid digestion fractionation factor (Defliese et al, 2015), sample size (Wacker et al, 2013), a sensitivity of phosphoric acid fractionation to the bulk or clumped isotopic compositions of carbonates (Wacker et al, 2014), differences in the procedures utilized by laboratories (e.g., Henkes et al, 2013;Came et al, 2014;Fernandez et al, 2014;Wacker et al, 2014;Defliese et al, 2015), kinetic isotope effects (Hill et al, 2014a;Tripati et al, 2015), and/or the substitution of different cations in the mineral lattice (Hill et al, 2014b;Yuan, 2015).…”