“…Over the last decade, semiconductor metal oxide nanosystems have been investigated as De-NO x photocatalysts, thanks to their favorable chemico-physical properties, relatively low cost, and good chemical stability. ,, In fact, the assembly of high-area nanocrystalline and defective structures positively affects material reactivity and charge transport phenomena, paving the way to an improved photocatalytic activity. ,,,,, Most literature works have involved the use of TiO 2 , ,,,, ZnO, ,,, and Fe 2 O 3 -containing systems, − ,, whereas other studies have focused on materials based on C 3 N 4 , , Mn 3 O 4 , SnO 2 , InVO 4 , ZnFe 2 O 4 , ZnWO 4 , Bi 2 GeO 5 , Bi 2 MoO 6 , Bi 2 Mo 3 O 12 , and Bi 2 WO 6 . To overcome the disadvantages exhibited by single photocatalysts, including limited Vis light absorption (as for TiO 2 ,,, ) and/or detrimental electron–hole recombination, ,,− a valuable tool is provided by the construction of heterojunctions between different semiconductors. ,,,,, The latter enable, in principle, to extend the radiation absorption range and favorably enhance charge carrier separation at the junction interfaces. ,,, An additional important issue is the development of supported photocatalysts, scarcely investigated so far at variance with the homologous powdered counterparts, ,, which allow to reduce the active material amount and are less hazardous, more stable, and more easily recoverable after use than the homologous powders. ,, …”