Carbonated Smart Water Injection for Optimized Oil Recovery in Chalk at High Temperature

Abstract

Finding cost-efficient ways of increasing oil production with a low carbon footprint is the new challenge for the petroleum industry that wants to meet the net-zero emission goals by 2050. Smart water injection is an EOR process that increases oil production and delays water breakthrough by wettability alteration. Seawater is a smart water in chalk reservoirs, being especially effective at high temperatures. Different studies have shown that the effectiveness of seawater can be further improved by modifying the ion composition before injection. Carbonated water (CW) has been proposed as a potential EOR fluid. In addition to producing extra oil, the reduction of greenhouse gas (CO2) in the atmosphere can be achieved by using carbonated smart water as an injection fluid. The main mechanism behind increased oil recovery by injecting carbonated water is believed to be oil viscosity reduction and swelling, as the CO2 is transferred from the aqueous phase to the oil phase. Wettability alteration has also been proposed as a possible mechanism, and this hypothesis is further investigated in this study along with other proposed mechanisms. Stevns Klint outcrop chalk was used in this study, this material is recognized as an excellent analogue for North Sea chalk reservoirs. Optimized oil recovery by carbonated water in chalk was investigated at a high temperature (130°C) by flooding carbonated formation water (CFW) and carbonated seawater (CSW), to be compared with high saline formation water (FW) and seawater (SW) flooding. The oil/brine/rock/CO2 interactions were tracked by measuring the pH of the produced water (PW) and by identifying any mineralogical changes by SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope) and EDX (Energy Dispersive X-Ray) analyses. The solubility of CO2 in different brines was measured and compared with simulation data performed by PHREEQC. The diffusion of CO2 from the aqueous phase to the oil phase was analysed to check if enough CO2 can be diffused from the carbonated water into the oil phase. By flooding CSW in both secondary and tertiary modes, a slight increase in the oil recovery was observed and was found to be the best performing brine. The oil recovery was also slightly increased using CFW in tertiary mode after FW which does not behave like smart water for carbonates. The solubility of CO2 was low and increased by increasing pressure and decreasing brine salinity. The acidity of CW did not increase by increasing pressure. No changes in pore surface minerals were observed after CW flooding, confirming limited mineral dissolution. A mass transfer of CO2 from the brine phase to the oil phase was confirmed in the experimental work, but a significant amount of CO2 remained in the brine phase. The main mechanism behind this extra oil observed using CW is most likely not linked to oil swelling and viscosity reduction or mineral dissolution which could affect the porosity and the permeability of the rock system. Wettability alteration is a more likely explanation but needs to be looked further into for confirmation.

Carbonated Water Injection for Enhanced Oil Recovery and CO2 Geosequestration in Different CO2 Repositories: A Review of Physicochemical Processes and Recent Advances

“…The effluent brine contained iron, silicon, and aluminum which were absent in the injected CW. However, Khan et al 123 presented contrasting results. They observed insignificant changes in the cation composition (Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ ) of the effluent brine when CW was injected into an oil-wet, nonfractured, and homogeneous Stevns Klint chalk sample at 290.16 psia and 130 °C.…”

“…The dissimilarity in the findings can be attributed to the variations in rock mineralogy and the pore volumes of injected CW in these experiments. Khan et al 123 conducted their investigation with a focus on dynamic testing through core flooding. The study involved the injection of a few PVs of CW at relatively low injection rates resembling the conditions in the main part of the reservoir.…”

“…Analogous to brine-saturated samples, numerous studies have attempted to evaluate the geochemical interactions that occur during CWI in oil-saturated samples (oil reservoirs). ,,, Carbonate reservoirs account for a greater portion of these studies compared to sandstones. EOR-CGS processes in the former are more challenging due to their extreme heterogeneity, complex fluid-rock interactions, and pore network systems …”

“…The dissimilarity in the findings can be attributed to the variations in rock mineralogy and the pore volumes of injected CW in these experiments. Khan et al . conducted their investigation with a focus on dynamic testing through core flooding.…”

Evaluation of Surface-Active Ionic Liquids in Smart Water for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Carbonate Rocks

“…The physical properties of the outcrop chalk cores were similar to those in previously published research. 78,79 3.3. Oil Recovery Tests.…”