2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2021.101633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbonation curing of cement mortars incorporating carbonated fly ash for performance improvement and CO2 sequestration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From the experimental results, it was found that the carbonation increases with the addition of FAs and SLA up to 6 months of exposure in coastal conditions (Table 6); the increase in carbonation depth in these mixes may be due to their high porosity compared to OPC mortar; this is attributed to the higher water contents in composites (Hsu et al, 2019) to maintain their workability (Table 4), while the partial substitution of cement by fine-grained additives simultaneously reduces the cement content in the mortars resulting the delay of the hydration process. According to the published materials, there exist few literatures that report the effect of fly ash addition on carbonation process (Qin et al, 2019), (Chen et al, 2021), (Czarnecki et al, 2018); these articles conclude that due to replacement of cement with fly ash, the rate of carbonation increases significantly. At the same time, the incorporation of fly ash leads to increased permeability of the hardened cement mortars at early ages; the latter affects effects on the resistance of mortar against carbonation and the diffusivity of CO2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the experimental results, it was found that the carbonation increases with the addition of FAs and SLA up to 6 months of exposure in coastal conditions (Table 6); the increase in carbonation depth in these mixes may be due to their high porosity compared to OPC mortar; this is attributed to the higher water contents in composites (Hsu et al, 2019) to maintain their workability (Table 4), while the partial substitution of cement by fine-grained additives simultaneously reduces the cement content in the mortars resulting the delay of the hydration process. According to the published materials, there exist few literatures that report the effect of fly ash addition on carbonation process (Qin et al, 2019), (Chen et al, 2021), (Czarnecki et al, 2018); these articles conclude that due to replacement of cement with fly ash, the rate of carbonation increases significantly. At the same time, the incorporation of fly ash leads to increased permeability of the hardened cement mortars at early ages; the latter affects effects on the resistance of mortar against carbonation and the diffusivity of CO2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 9 shows the XRD patterns of the C3 cement slurry system after curing for 7 days at different temperatures (50, 300, 400, 500, and 600 °C) in a CO 2 atmosphere. Figure 9 shows that the main phases of C3 cement cured at 50 °C are CH, SiO 2 , C-S-H and CaCO 3 (Chen et al, 2021;Chen et al, 2022). A large amount of SiO 2 is contained in the cement owning to the addition of quartz sand to C3.…”
Section: Phase Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most alkaline cementitious materials, such as Portland cement, blast furnace slag, and y ash, can absorb CO 2 , and carbonation reaction processes generally result in progressive alkali decrease or neutralization. [3][4][5][6] Carbon xation may enhance the cementitious ability when alkaline oxides, such as calcium oxide (CaO) and magnesium oxide (MgO), in building materials react with CO 2 to generate insoluble and stable carbonates. Current knowledge indicates that CO 2 treatment of cementbased materials (CBMs) at early age can not only absorb a large amount of CO 2 but also rene the microstructure and improve mechanical properties and durability performances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%