2011
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60780-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel doublet chemotherapy compared with monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: IFCT-0501 randomised, phase 3 trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
306
1
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 514 publications
(341 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
10
306
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Four studies [18,19,21,24] were specifically devoted to PS2 patients, while two trials [22,25] reported subgroup analysis for PS2 patients (18 and 20%, respectively) within larger randomized phase III trials. All trials compared a platinumbased doublet with single-agent chemotherapy; four of these [18,21,22,24] compared carboplatin-based doublet with single agent chemotherapy: carboplatin plus pemetrexed vs pemetrexed alone [18], carboplatin plus gemcitabine vs gemcitabine alone [21,24], carboplatin plus paclitaxel vs paclitaxel alone [22,25]; the other two trials compared cisplatin plus gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone [19] and cisplatin plus vinorelbine or vindesine with vinorelbine alone [23]. In nearly every trial characteristics were well balanced between two arms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four studies [18,19,21,24] were specifically devoted to PS2 patients, while two trials [22,25] reported subgroup analysis for PS2 patients (18 and 20%, respectively) within larger randomized phase III trials. All trials compared a platinumbased doublet with single-agent chemotherapy; four of these [18,21,22,24] compared carboplatin-based doublet with single agent chemotherapy: carboplatin plus pemetrexed vs pemetrexed alone [18], carboplatin plus gemcitabine vs gemcitabine alone [21,24], carboplatin plus paclitaxel vs paclitaxel alone [22,25]; the other two trials compared cisplatin plus gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone [19] and cisplatin plus vinorelbine or vindesine with vinorelbine alone [23]. In nearly every trial characteristics were well balanced between two arms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So this is the only study included in our meta-analysis with missing haematological toxicity data. A French study [25] of carboplatin-paclitaxel compared with weekly paclitaxel alone was devoted to elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, but included 123 patients (27.3% of study population) with PS 2. Anyway the extraction of specific outcome measurements and toxicity for PS2 patients is not possible and therefore we had to exclude this study.…”
Section: Citaɵonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Studies have shown that fit older patients with cancer may benefit from chemotherapy as much as younger patients. [2][3][4] As the age of patients with cancer treated with chemotherapy continues to rise, there is a growing need to recognize and try to prevent complications of treatment that are common in this population. Fall-related injuries (FRIs) are a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination produced better OS compared with single -agent with the cost of increased toxicity (especially neutropenia). Patients in both arms received erlotinib at the Time of Progression [10]. Nab-paclitaxel alone chemotherapy showed beneficial results as far as median OS is concerned with manageable toxicities [11].…”
Section: Single Agent Vs Platinum-based Doubletmentioning
confidence: 99%